It's here! It was really just a matter of time but today is the day and the first official teaser trailer for The Dark Knight Rises has leaked online.
Damn just missed it, want to see this trailer so bad
Umm, what do you mean? The trailer is right there.
The attached video works.
I am curious who was in the bed? I couldn't make it out, too dark.
That was Gordon in the bed.
Really want to know why Batman were gone and why Bruce is saying Batman dosent exsit anymore? And Evil rises
Because Bruce wanted to give up Batman at the end of Dark Knight.. remember, he blamed himself for Rachel's death.
My best guess is since the batman is wanted for the murder of harvey dent in the dark knight movie, he's probably laying low.
At about 1:30 is that bane? The way this is going its like when Batman cartoons turned into Batman Beyond haha. looks so awesome, can't wait for the high resolution to release.
Bane breaks Batman back, and this is why he says there is no more Batman.
Nah, man Batman doesn't exist anymore, because the way The Dark Knight ended. Evil rises, means Bane is wreaking havoc probably, and Ras is back. And yes, that's Bane.
Can't fricking wait for 2012. :D
I never dont get it. Catgirl is good or villian? IN comics its villian, but in game she is good. WTF is this... 1)Ra villian 2)Bane villian 3)Catwoman - Good or villian? No, you dont get it. He dosent exist anymore, becuase he leaves everything. He said: You were gone for long time. Its just like Batman Returns, he leaves Batman job, or like in Spiderman 2, he leaves everything behind and dosent want to be a hero anymore. Batman/Bruce :What if he doesn't exist anymore? Gordon: Batman must come back, he must.... he must.... Like Christopher Nolan said before, there is no Batman/Dark Knight, he leaves everything behind. And years later he comes back and everything is gone.
Catwoman isn't a villain, or an ally. What I meant was, Batman doesn't exist anymore, because Bruce decided at the end of the Dark Knight to not be Batman anymore, because Rachel died, Gordon pretended to take a bullet for the mayor, and the Joker created Two-Face. Bruce knows he has limits as both Batman, and Bruce. He can't be Batman forever, but he also can't stand to see Gotham in ruins.
@LtSkittles I don't think he ever says that he won't be Batman anymore. He just becomes the fall guy for the stuff Harvey Dent does in the end. He does this voluntarily because Harvey Dent was Gotham City's white knight and a symbol of hope. I could be wrong however because I haven't seen it in ages.
What I mean is he says "Batman is the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one we need right now" Bruce has given up the Batman persona, and in this tailer he says Batman doesn't exist anymore which, I'm guessing he no longer sees the need for Batman. And yes, he did do it voluntarily, because if Gotham knew about Two-Face, the Joker would've won.
idk where I read it but, Catwoman is the perfect shade of grey side of the law (where as Batman is black, Bain is white) where Batman will allow her to steal, etc. as long as she helps him out. She's Batman's love interest, not Bruce's. And because Rachel died, Nolan had to fill that void somehow...
Awesome looking trailer. Can't wait!
I haven't been able to catch any of these bootleg trailers...and I don't really care to. I'd much rather see it in better quality.
Yeah.. I'm avoiding it too..
I was weak... I couldn't help myself:(
Yea, couldn't help myself either. It's just a teaser trailer, though, so no big deal. It's the spoiler type stuff that I'll be avoiding like the plague.
Calling it now Batman will die.
Nope. It's called the Dark Knight Rises, killing Batman off wouldn't make sense then. I could see your point if it was called something else, I don't know what else though. Nolan could very well kill off Batman, and get away with it, with WB, and DC giving him the permission too. It'd be a lot harder to get that, then say the comic book. But Nolan won't kill off Batman.
Never know. This is Nolans last and it could work like comic books. Generally each writer does about 7 issues, and if they don't get signed on to write another 7 they normally do some big event without a closure point so the next writer can take the event and work with it. He could "kill" Batman, then WB could lead that into the next movie. He really isn't "dead" and is back. Remember Bane did break Batman's back. He could easily "go out of commission" then maybe have a glimpse of a "new" batman on a building just as it ends.
I don't think so, I think they're going to reboot the whole franchise, and I think what's going to happen is that Ryan Reynolds will end up being the Green Lantern for a while, Man of Steel will come out, and then we'll either get a sequel, or a reboot, or a reboot after a sequel, and then we'll get more DC movies, and hopefully set up a Justice League movie. I think Warner Bros. might want to reboot it also, because they want a Batman who isn't grounded in reality like Nolan's is. And I could be completely wrong, and we could see it your way.
I should have clarified, Bruce Wayne will die, You can't kill an idea and/or symbol. This way the story comes full circle and the people of Gotham will see the sacrifice one man made and all the good his company has done for the city. This will cause people to reject evil and Rise together against it, the very goal that Bruce Wayne in this saga set out for. It will be a brilliant way to end Nolan's vision of the Batman saga. Look at him kind of like Jesus Christ. In the beginning he found himself and stumbled along the way the same way a young Jesus did. Then he was tested and tempted by the joker who was pure evil just like Jesus in the desert was tempted by the devil. Finally he embraces what he is and is willing to sacrifice it all for the greater good just like Jesus. I swear Nolan used the story of Jesus as a basis for his vision. Going to be fantastic.
bane and catwoman suck ridller and the penguin would have been much better.
i am honestly surprised Nolan went this direction too. In a way Bane isn't a well known villian in the mainstream area so im interested to see it. However at the same time Penguin and Ridler fit better into Nolans style so it would of been interesting to see that.
But Bane has already been done before. Even though it was in the terrible Batman & Robin. I really would have liked to see the riddler. Even though he also has appeared in a batman movie.
It just doesnt seem right to end it with bane and catwoman there is no way they will be as cool and as legendary as the Joker.
I dont know why he ditched the two characters that would have started crazy hype for this movie and would have been a more awesome combination then bane and catwoman.
He basically slammed the door in the face of the A list villians n batman and got some B listers.
Really not excited about this movie and as you said these villians arent mainstream peoople arent going to get a excited seeing bane and freaking catwoman then they would if it was the Ridler and penguin.
I feel Nolans trying to be unique for the sake of being unique trying to challenge himself to get this absurd combination to work and in turn screwing over the fans...
I really can't imagine how they will fit catwoman in this film.
Have you seen the actress playing catwoman she really doesnt look the part...
Soldierone- I agree that Riddler and Penguin are better known in the Batman universe; since the 60's. However Bane is the nemesis that injured/killed Bruce Wayne/Batman. For that reason alone makes Bane a perfect character if Nolan wants to end his storyline and have someone else input his own storyline i.e. - reboot the Batman.
isnt it funny u have never seen out of all the other batman movies a sequel... the only reason dark knight was a huge success is because heath ledger died. So now there making a part 2 of the first crap ass movie only to make money, and its sad because no1 has any good ideas anymore and they just use the name of old things to sell it... cars, movies, video games ect.
Umm what? Batman has never had a sequel? Umm Batman, Batman Returns. Definitely sequels. And The Dark Knight was a sequel to Batman Begins. Which leads to: what are you talking about part 2? This is Part 3. And I'd hardly call it crap. The reason it did so good and was so successful is because Nolan created a great movie with Batman Begins. Did Ledger's death help raise more hype? Yes. But the movie would've still been a huge success because it was great and it was the follow up to another great movie. I think Nolan has proven that they can come up with unique and creative ideas (Inception being one), but even his take on the Batman was done in a way we've never seen before.
all batman movies are different tho... different batmans duh... you have never seen a batman movie with the same batman made 2 times. There gonna use christian bale again for dark knight 2 of course... its sad.
not only that, but if heath ledger didnt die, the movie wouldnt have been a top 3 most sold movie ever... no batman was and no batman ever would be, and if you ask me, batman returns was the best 1 ever imo
Sorry, don't take offense, but I don't think you know what you're talking about. I know there are different Batmans and I took that into consideration when determining what is and isn't a sequel. Michael Keaton played Batman in both "Batman" and "Batman Returns". You'd think you'd know this since you try to say "Batman Returns" is your favorite. So, that makes "Batman Returns" a definite sequel. Also, you keep talking like "The Dark Knight" is the first in the series of the new Batman movies. Not true at all. Before that was "Batman Begins", Nolan's first Batman movie. Bale also played Batman in that one, making "The Dark Knight" a sequel. "The Dark Knight Rises" is actually a threequel. So, yes, there have been two Batman sequels. And I've seen two actors portray the character in multiple movies (Bale is about to be on his third). P.S. The Dark Knight is not a top 3 best selling movie. Right now it's barely in the Top 10. Even at it's time, it wasn't top 3. It was top 5. And since then several others have come along to bump it further down the list (and Harry Potter is about to do it again). But yes, obviously Ledger's death created more buzz and helped make the movie bring in more money, but the movie was still going to be hugely successful either way. It already had HUGE buzz behind it before Ledger even died. Viral marketing in 2007 blew the internet up and created a huge buzz for the movie. This was before Ledger was dead. So, dead Ledger or not, this movie was going to make a ton of money and be a huge success either way. Especially after the success of Nolan's "Batman Begins", which made almost $400 million itself I think it was (and that's nothing at all to sneeze at).
I agree with you on that i dont mind catwoman since she does become batmans love in the later years but what a terrible selection of characters bane and ra's al ghul are so boring he already used weak ass ra's in part 1 and what kinda batman fan grew up fully intrested in bane or ra's al ghul??? i would say less then 5% in the whole world give a shit about bane or ra's al ghul..and bane never killed batman just broke his back u shouldn't make stuff up like that.
FilmWatch is a community of awesome people posting and discussing the latest movie news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.