The Amazing Spider-Man 2: First Look At Shailene Woodley As Mary Jane Watson
CBM
Face it Tiger...you just hit the jackpot? Hit the jump to check out the first Amazing Spider-Man 2 set photos of actress, Shailene Woodley (The Descendants), as Mary Jane Watson.
(Cinema, The Amazing Spider-Man 2)
Anyone else really hoepful this is pre-wardrobe/makeup? I hate to start hating on the girl before I see her in the the role but ....Yea...She has absolutely NO sex appeal like MJ should have. COme on guys, even you all can admit that Kirsten Dunst looked way better.
Sweet pic of spidey though...check out those non silver reflective feet.
This girl doesn't look good enough to be Mary Jane, at least not judging by these pictures. Mary Jane is supposed to be really, really fine, a raging beauty. It's been 10 years since I read a Spidey comic. But I remember Mary Jane being unbridled hotness. This girl is not unbridled hotness; actually she's not even hotness. She just has the basic sex appeal that any woman gets from being the proper weight and looking healthy.
I don't know guys... I think she can pull off MJ ... just wait for the movie. The cute girl next door...check the pics attached below. I think she will be a nice fit for the role.
I think they deliberately put the bad pics online just to get hits or to start some controversy.... Just remember, everybody stumbles into some bad light occassionally where pictures are concerned LOL.. I think they just put up the worst picture of her that they had.
how can the same person look so different in every picture? girls are really cheating real life with the make up and such they wear. she had to have some plastic surgeery and other stuff to.
She looks quite Ok but would rather they pick Mary Elizabeth Winstead ( http://www.moviewatchlist.c... ) think see looks the part plus quite a good actress.
..maybe we're wrong, we'll see anyway once movie gets up and going.
dude ugh that chick is NOT I REPEAT NOOOOOT MJ quality !!!!!!!!!!! BOOOOOOO BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO
I still don't see the point in this new franchise, I wish they would of just continued without the whole origin story crap
I wanted to see an older Peter Parker, in his late 30s who's becoming tired of being Spiderman. He's battled the Lizard, he's faced Kingpin, he's had multiple encounters with the Green Goblin, he's married to MJ who knows he's Spiderman etc but then he meets his true enemy...Venom and in the end the Venom Symbiote gives birth to Carnage which would be the enemy in Spiderman 3 but his backstory to how he it finds it's way to Cletus is the smaller plot in Spiderman 2.
lol stop being selfish guys, as an example im sure you would jump at the opportunity to be spiderman if you like the character and not give a damn what anyone else things
Now - Join us on Filmwatch as we celebrate the release of Star Trek Into Darkness this month with a must-have collectible for Star Trek fans! | Promoted post
70°
140°
480°
150°
Ad 
80°
30°
Uhmm...
Yea...
Anyone else really hoepful this is pre-wardrobe/makeup? I hate to start hating on the girl before I see her in the the role but ....Yea...She has absolutely NO sex appeal like MJ should have. COme on guys, even you all can admit that Kirsten Dunst looked way better.
Sweet pic of spidey though...check out those non silver reflective feet.
... and I think Shailene looks TERRIBLE as Watson.
I'm used to a busty smiling voluptuous sexy cool Mary Jane Watson from the comics, not some skinny sour emo girls.
Kirsten Dunst did look better.
This girl doesn't look good enough to be Mary Jane, at least not judging by these pictures. Mary Jane is supposed to be really, really fine, a raging beauty. It's been 10 years since I read a Spidey comic. But I remember Mary Jane being unbridled hotness. This girl is not unbridled hotness; actually she's not even hotness. She just has the basic sex appeal that any woman gets from being the proper weight and looking healthy.
i really hope they aren't going for a brunette Mj. <_<
Related image(s)
Just like this pic
Related image(s)
Bring Sam Raimi back Sony.
..maybe we're wrong, we'll see anyway once movie gets up and going.
BOOOOOOO BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO
I still don't see the point in this new franchise, I wish they would of just continued without the whole origin story crap
I wanted to see an older Peter Parker, in his late 30s who's becoming tired of being Spiderman. He's battled the Lizard, he's faced Kingpin, he's had multiple encounters with the Green Goblin, he's married to MJ who knows he's Spiderman etc but then he meets his true enemy...Venom and in the end the Venom Symbiote gives birth to Carnage which would be the enemy in Spiderman 3 but his backstory to how he it finds it's way to Cletus is the smaller plot in Spiderman 2.
nitpicking is what im seeing in some comments
as for me i have no problem with the this person
Related image(s)