All Channels
350°

North Korea was NOT behind the Sony hack according to multiple security experts

Daily Mail: The FBI last week announced that they had discovered conclusive evidence proving the North Korean government was behind the Sony hack
President Obama then attacked the country for their behavior during a news conference, and informed them that the United States would retaliate
Now, the findings of the FBI are being called into question by many of the cybersecurity industry's leading experts
What's more, after an independent investigation, Norse has determined that they believe a woman named 'Lena' is responsible for the hack
Almost every expert stated that they believe the hack had to have been an inside job.

Read Full Story >>
dailymail.co.uk
coolbeans3409d ago

This just keeps getting more and more interesting. Just an excuse to cyber-attack N Korea, perhaps?

Defectiv3_Detectiv33409d ago

I find it hard to believe that N. Korea wasn't involved in some fashion. Unless this is just a case of incredible irony.

Amuro3409d ago (Edited 3409d ago )

the FBI seem to be clueless when it comes to cyber crimes.

SilentNegotiator3409d ago (Edited 3409d ago )

Unlike the people making conclusions without raw data?

SnakeCQC3409d ago

I think the whole thing was just to detract people from the torture report.

Hold_It3409d ago

Was probably Sony to generate an audience for this film. According to the leaked emails, none of the other countries outside of the US like Seth Rogen and/or James Franco. Call it a conspiracy theory, but it seems like they went through all this trouble to generate controversy so the movie wouldn't tank.

Porcelain_Chicken3409d ago

Hmm, advertisement via terrorism that COULD possibly lead to a 10 year squinting battle with North Korea? Eh, i dunno. Kind of far fetched.

SilentNegotiator3408d ago

Do you honestly not understand how dumb that conspiracy theory is? To fake an act of terrorism and get the federal government involved to sell a movie?

Hold_It3408d ago

It's not as dumb as people who believe that Jihadists actually did 9/11 or that our government isn't corrupt.

RetrospectRealm3408d ago

@Your second comment: Not cool man, not cool.

ngecenk3408d ago

yeah, but you forget one thing in your theory: the movie did not even reach the theatre!

BeastBoxOne3408d ago

This is BAD news for Sony, not good, so why the hell would they create all of this? Just to profit on one movie? Come on, man.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3408d ago
Show all comments (17)
80°

Bad Boys For Life- red band trailer (Sony) In theaters January 17th, 2020

The Bad Boys Mike Lowrey (Will Smith) and Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence) are back together for one last ride in the highly anticipated Bad Boys for Life.

50°

How The Spiderman Deal Will Affect The Future of The MCU

With Disney and Sony fighting over Spiderman rights, let's take a look at how the Marvel Cinematic Universe will deal with Spideys' absence...

Read Full Story >>
screenwars.in
1220°

Spider-Man cancellation is Disney's fault, not Sony's

Marvel/Disney have failed to extend their Spider-Man licensing deal after negotiation with Sony went south. Tom Holland won't be returning as Spidey in MCU.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
BrownRanger1710d ago

it's Sony's IP. Disney had no right to demand. They messed this up.

Ace3261710d ago

It isn't Sony's IP. Sony has the film license for Spider-Man. Marvel still owns Spider-Man so if anything Sony is holding Spider-Man film license hostage.

Prince-Ali1710d ago

Nah that's LITERALLY not how it works or business in general ... lool Disney fucked this one up!

Allsystemgamer1710d ago

Sony owns the film RIGHTS to Spider-Man. There’s no hostage taking. Marvel sold it to them. They own it.

bradfh1710d ago

Sony saved spider-man if Disney was going to make him gay.

zodiac9091709d ago

@Ace326 Were you born yesterday? Sony has held the rights for this film IP for more than 15 years now..

killswitch801709d ago

Why are people down voting Ace326 they are the only person that said it correctly . They have timed license agreement and if they do not make Spider-man in a set amount of years they lose the license. This is what happened back in the 90s a studio rushed to make a Fantastic Four film so they would not lose the license.

Chevalier1709d ago

" Why are people down voting Ace326 they are the only person that said it correctly . They have timed license agreement and if they do not make Spider-man in a set amount of years they lose the license. This is what happened back in the 90s a studio rushed to make a Fantastic Four film so they would not lose the license."

All Sony has to do is prove they have a movie in development and they retain their license indefinitely though. With Spiderverse 2 already in development, Venom 2 and all the other Spiderman characters like Black Cat, Silver Sable movies in development already there's ZERO chance Sony will lose Spiderman.

Disney has no power in these negotiations. Same with why there are no solo Hulk movies because Universal has those rights. Disney wants more to go from taking 5% to 50% when Sony's movies make the same worldwide compared to Disneys Spiderman movies why would Sony agree to that?! Amazing Spiderman made almost as much as Homecoming did worldwide so there's no reason to believe they can't again.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1709d ago
SodoBot1710d ago

Anyone knows when Sony lose the license?

2pacalypsenow1710d ago

They would have to not make a Spider Man movie for like 5 years I believe.

TricksterArrow1710d ago

Does this count animated movies? Because I think they can go on forever with those. There's absolutely endless possibilities.

Ace3261710d ago

Essentially never. The rerelease of Far From Home will start the 5 year cycle over. Venom 2 is in development and I believe that also counts towards the license.

Chevalier1709d ago

They also have Silver Sable/Black Cat and Spiderverse 2 already in development too.

kevinsheeks1709d ago

unfortunately as long as they make one even if trash they have it forever essentially :(

1710d ago Replies(1)
Deadpoolio1709d ago

Yeah because clearly Sony are intelligent and not going to deal with Disney's crap....Sony 100% financed the Spider-man films, and gave Disney 5% of the box office....Disney also got 100% of the films merchandising rights and 100% of the money that the merchandise makes.....

There is no universe where Disney deserves 50% of the profits, when they put in ZERO dollars, let Sony finance it all yet give them nothing for the merchandise and, nothing for the MCU films that Spider-man has appeared in....Greedy Disney looking to be greedy again....

Just like how they change things in Star Wars to avoid paying Lucas royalties, and refuse to make a solo Hulk film because Universal has to be atleast asked IF they want to distribute it.....Gotta love Disney can't make all the money for something so they would rather make nothing....

MIDNIITE_Z3RO1709d ago

Disney's other properties make so much money, that's why they can afford to try and make moves like this, come out with nothing, and still be ok. Kinda sucks, but I already know where Sony is gonna go with this. Gonna do a Venom-Spidey film for sure now. I'd be surprised if that doesn't go down.

1709d ago
SuggestionBoy1710d ago

Well.. at least we are getting another Matrix movie with Keanu: )

Retroman1710d ago

Yeah, but without Morpheus (Laurence Fishburn) Neo can't hold the complete movie alone without Morpheus.

KingPin1709d ago (Edited 1709d ago )

actually, morpheus isn't needed as much now all things considered.
Neo believes he is the one. Morpheus character arc of finding, training and making him believe he is the one to make peace between man and machine is complete.

would be nice to have him in the movie though but its not a make or break thing.

Edit: i would rather be hoping that Hugo Weaving makes a return.

Show all comments (56)