See, we have one guy arguing about source material. Basically what he's saying is, since Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is more of an original take than a complete story swiped from the comics, it should not have too much characters. Only the source material must have a ton of characters.
This is what you get when fanboys take something overly serious.
You're the one who is confused here and attempting to argue with nonsense. Do I need to explain in great detail? Rey vs Ren, so of course I'm talking about Luke vs Vader, not Luke vs the Death Star.
And you're the only one talking about New Hope, or you're just saying that to save face. Clearly, TFA didn't just copy New Hope.
OK, so I'm saying Luke who had more training than Rey couldn't defeat Vader first shot, but Rey who had no ...
What the hell was Luke doing on Dagobah? He got training from Yoda there. he was also trained briefly by Obi-Wan. You seem confused.
Rey's emergence without training should never trump a person who had already emerged and got years of training. Luke didn't go out and defeat the bad guy first shot.
Believe it or not, but The Force Awakens is just an average copycat film. A film designed with political goals and to become a yearly pop culture money make...
I disagree. Luke gets a pass here because he had two masters in the form of Obiwan and Yoda. Most of what he did early in the film was due to training. Rey had no one, but managed to defeat Kylo Ren who was trained to use the force and a light-saber for several years.
Fanboys do not want to acknowledge the faults of the film because they are so desperate for a hit. But truth is truth. The Force Awakens is a well oiled feminist propaganda machine. It will become the top earn...
You're saying that because the reviewer didn't give it a 10/10, right? Lol. You fanboys and your crappy rehashed movie. Haven't you seen this film before from way back when? ;)
This is foolishness. It doesn't matter that much. We've now reached a point where people are complaining about whether or not characters in movies should smile. No one realizes how stupid this is?
And to make matters worse, Bruce did smile in the trailer. Furthermore, Clark Kent will smile because he did in Man of Steel, and now that he's with Lois Lane, how could he not? We've also seen a clear sign that Bruce will interact with Diana, so he is going to pul...
Gal Gadot has muscles though. You didn't see her while she was in the gym, clearly.
That's the Disney version. This is one is being made with the original story in mind. Unlike the Disney version, this one is a dark tale with no happy endings. Furthermore, Universal can't call their Little Mermaid, Ariel. In the original story, she did not have a name.
Ariel belongs to Disney.
I like the idea of it not being all leather. A tech-based suit could explain why he can run so fast and still manage to have a squeaky clean suit that is free from wear.
A tech-based suit could withstand the force of his immense speed a lot better, just as long as it is not fully metal. Make it leather for comfort, but allow the mechanics and overall technology to tap into the speedforce to help protect his body and also the suit.
Bear in mind that at the end...
I think Daredevil is a good show, and I do agree that the ATOM is one annoying character. However, to say that DC should worry because of one show is a bit crazy. Bear in mind that Agents of SHIELD isn't even real. Yes, Coulson is still dead in the movies but alive in the TV show. Apparently, everything that is going on is just a dream of a dying man. These are the words from Whedon himself.
Now tell me, how can a series of a dying man dreaming have episodes that connect ...
I'm surprised no one has commented on how stupid Cavill lol I remember saying the same thing that BvS is not a Man of Steel sequel because it is so effing obvious. Still, folks chose to chastise me for making sense.
Man of Steel sequel with the word Batman at the beginning of the title.....makes perfect sense, eh?
This is not Gal Gadot. Sometimes I have to wonder if the editors at CBM have little or no care for fact checking stuff lol.
Gal Gadot right now doesn't have much muscle, but her body looks better than this chick.
And yes, GOTG had a shit ending for sure lol.
I'm not the biggest fan of Marvel and their need to release films with simple stories filled with cheese. However, there needs to be a fine line between Spiderman's darkness and his jolly ways. A movie about Spiderman is not something that deserves to go dark.
Nothing is wrong with the list. It's the author's personal preference.
You know what, would Seth Rogen and James Franco have the balls to create a film about killing Barack Obama? It could work if the bad guys are doing it, but painting Obama as the bad guy and have a bunch of good guys set out to kill him would cause a fking outrage.
Have you dropped so far to the bottom that you'd want to defend crappy website design that was created for getting more ad views rather than being easy to read available content?
This website is pretty shitty to read. The moment I realized I'd have to press next to read more, I jumped ship.
Good actors can be fitted to any role because they are good actors. :/
I thought I told you to keep your weird reasoning skills on the N4G channel with all the other crazy people.
Your comment is misguided. You say there are three Batman movies where he won, well, there are three Iron Man movies where he won, two Thor films where he won, two Captain America films where he won, so what's your point again? I'm sorry, I missed it.
As for Suicide Squad, no one knows what the film is about, so to say it is about this person and that person....you know, you're just attempting to find something significant to say and all you have done, is spit out...