thorstein is right, most people that have a good opinion aren't writing a review about it, they're going to see it again. Most people who have a bad review are saying "gotta have my pretentious opinion heard"! It's sad really.
Take another example, follow Star Wars on Facebook. Any comment will be liked 1000's of times by fans, second reaction love, 3rd may have 50ish dislikes(angry). However if you go through the comments, it's 50/50. Mos...
Nah, definitely rather not.
Dude you mean Finn could have escaped and Poe was unneeded. And Rogue One was the most forced garbage out there. The plot was seriously "lets get as many low-voiced people of every race to take out the Death Star". None of them were diverse in character, everyone of them just talked in a low voice and that's pretty damn objective. You can literally quantify how everyone talked in a low voice from start to finish in that movie.
Finn was actually a good char...
Not sitting well with most audiences? 93% on Rotten Tomatoes and half the Metacritic bad reviews are because some characters were colored. Seriously? We're not allowed to have colored characters now? Even so it's got a more positive score than negative so don't know what you're arguing there, even with the crybaby "this-movie-made-me-a-whi te-victim" SJWs out there.
And I never once said only positive reviews could be casual fans, you're th...
Such fucking BS. Finn and Rey led TFW, they both even participated in the lightsaber battle. Finn was even better than Rey.
And you say "all of the Star Wars films" as if there are like 50 with female leads. No, Rey is just one lead in Star Wars and has been that way for two movies, and will likely stay that way for the trilogy.
Iden Versio was shit and that was Dice's fault.
And token characters? Shit, they're goo...
Seriously? I'm talking to these two who say "minorities are token characters" and say the film is SJW multiple times all over this thread. This has nothing to do with the review, this has to do with their comments.
TF, seriously? Finn and Rose are good characters, that's all there is to it. Iden Versio was shit and that was shoehorned as fuck, but Finn carried TFW and was even better than Rey.
All these races in the galaxy and you're mad they're not all white- instead of realizing what makes them good.
Definitely agree. Star Wars has never been particularly heavy on plot, rather effects and character driven. This was though, analytically it's the first to go into personal motive that isn't "let's destroy the empire", we're talking about characters with their own personal motives and ideals that drive them. It explored human themes like abandonment, loss, failure, without giving up the Star Wars charm that we're used to. It easily had the most plot and most ...
Legit the best Star Wars story I've ever seen. It explored more human themes, from depression, to abandonment, betrayal, and so forth, without giving up the Star Wars charm that the originals had. Plot-wise it was easily the most thorough of all Star Wars movies because let's be honest, Star Wars analytically was always character and effects-driven anyway- not extremely heavy on plot. The fact that they actually went into character backstories, personal motives, and had a ton of pl...
Or maybe that it was far more in-depth than any other Star Wars movie? Had more characterization, more plot analytically, changed the direction of the story, explored different human themes- depression, abandonment, and so forth? Or maybe you're just too far up your own ass to admit someone might have an opinion based on reason and you've got nothing but butthurt?
Yeah, you have no vested interest, quit acting like your opinion is fact for someone else. I thought Finn and Rose were both good characters.
That's like saying Lando had to be integral to 5, and I'd personally say Rose and Finn are way more interesting.
Seriously, give your self-righteous ass a break.
It's not an objectively bad film. Your opinion isn't some arbitrary standard. There's no such thing as objectively bad unless you're talking about something that has something quantifiable. As in objectively bad at using the color red often. Objectively bad at having people talk in a certain tone. Even so, that doesn't mean the film is objectively good or bad, you can only make a subjective analysis based on those facts, because someone may like it using more or less ...
Impressed that you could take your subjective opinion so damn far. Every time someone says they enjoyed it you say "what about my points?" as if your opinion is some arbitrary standard.(furthermore, you don't really have any points, at all)
Personally, I thought it was single best of all of the Star Wars films- had the most plot analytically, the most characterization in my opinion, the characters were well differentiated, and the plot darker than any others....
Original series was cancer, this will be worst.
Most of Hollywood are non-actors. Geez having every character talk in a low voice 100% of the time is not characterization.
Easy.
Andrew Garfield was decent though, I'd take him over the new guy. No need to keep restarting Spidey as a kid as well. Insomniac is doing it right with a 23 year old Spidey.
Or an Obi-Wan movie.
People still watch this cancer?
=/
Seriously, 4/5?
MCU and DCCU are collectively a 1/10 on a good day.
I thought it was great. Far better writing than any other Star Wars.