SOmetimes they hit and sometimes they miss. All they can report on is what they're told and for the love of all that is holy why would they want to disclose that information right? Then they'd never get any insider info.

Makes sense. But why would a source not go to Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter or Collider? Those sites are bigger than Latino Review. I guess LR pay their sources better.

You seem to use the "source" a tad bit loosely, as anybody can be a "source". Heck, my cousin could be a source for rumors, does that make the "source" credible? Heck no. I could write similar BS on my site and simply say "well, I have a source, and cannot say who it is", will you believe everything you read online? Come on now, sources need to be credible, otherwise it is just gossip, and it seems that this post is exactly that, gossip.

I am biased I guess... I have no respect for rumors and gossip, but hey, that's me.

As far as we know it's as credible of a rumor as it isn't. So you can say whatever you wish, but with the things LR has uncovered in the past, I'm not as quick as you to call BS. Rumors get wrong all the time, still run to read 'em sometimes.