WC: There’s no denying the fact that the recently rebooted Spider-Man franchise has proved itself to be a little underwhelming. Coming off the back of Sam Raimi’s trilogy, which consisted of one good film, one great film, and one very misguided film (in that order), it’s safe to say that expectations were high, but not exactly impossible to meet. “Anything will be better than Spider-Man 3,” we all told ourselves. And though The Amazing Spider-Man certainly was a superior picture, it didn’t exactly set the world on fire.
With the new The Crow remake coming soon, we take a look back at the 30-year-old cult classic original–and where the stars are now.
Kaam Chalu Hai Review: Based on true events, this movie is thought-provoking and inspiring
Rebel Moon Part 2 Review: This movie doesn't feel anything new or worth remembering, which is a shame.
1) It's all Oscorp's fault. Everything is always Oscorp's fault.
I don't think it should be made. The second one was beyond horrible.
no, no, no.
no clones, whatever they do, no clones.
don't get me wrong, i love Emma Stone, but no clones.
Simmons back as J. Jonah Jameson however?
hell yeah.
I'd post J.K. Simmons name here ten times, but that'd just be trolling.
I prefer "amazing spider-man". I think people are just comparing the two universes too much and sure maybe the reboot was too quick after the old one but Batman has done it now in a much shorter time who knows how that will turn out.
I prefer Garfield I think his character is more likeable and has a good sense of humour. I didn't like Electro because I don't like Jamie Foxx at the best of times. Harry was great it was a great mix of the two universes.
I think Norman Osborn was killed off too quickly. The lizard was a strong enough character in the first film.
I hope they don't hand off the spider-man costume to another character if you're going to kill him fine do it and then give it 10 years and reboot it then.