Batman v Superman has been in production for 3 years man!!! That's quite the opposite of rushing. And awful casting is your opinion.
With that said I agree Marvel is owning! But DC just got started so... Yeah.
I wanna agree but T3, TS and The Sarah Connor Chronicles were really nothing special. I feel as though keeping our expectations dangerously low is the best thing this movie can hope for and that's never a good thing.
Hmm, maybe for the best. MoS felt like a clash of Snyder, Nolan and Goyer puzzle pieces that didn't know quite how to fit together. I loved MoS but it had its flaws.
Uh oh. It's the AquaMomoa thing all over agin!!!
Eh I don't think absolutely everything has to be connected and chock full of Easter eggs to the opposite show. Keeping focus on one character can give them the opportunity to make that one character truly shine. And personally I love Dr.Fate. I'm pretty sure they can come up with something.
"It's more Avengers, are you really complaining?"
I rather have 1 good Avengers movie than 2 mediocre ones. If they are splitting it into a 2 parter i hope it's for the sake of really telling the story well and not just to milk the franchise with another movie. Harry Potter & Twilight, i'm looking at you.
That sounds like Fox alright.... :I
Just like Fantastic Four 1 & 2 were their reply to fans who wanted a good portrayal of Marvel's first team of heroes. Dammit Fox.
Are you under the impression that after Snyder finishes the JL he'll go on to direct Man of steel 2, Wonder Woman, Shazam, The Batman, Aquaman, Green Lantern, The Flash and every other Dccu movie after that by himself? @_@ Surely WB is considering other directors and is just using Snyder as someone to set the tone for these characters. He did well enough with Superman. Wouldn't want some cr@p director giving us another "Green Lantern" would we? :o If Snyder and Terrio establ...
Wow lol. You weren't kidding. You thought a lot about this didn't ya! Well it's a pretty good argument. You actually reassured me a little more than I already was! XD you deserve a bub+ just for the sheer amount on research you had to go through. Go ask for Cazay & Darklordzor's opinions on this now.
Makes sense. I've always thought Xena was loosely based on WW. Both fierce warrior women. Dark hair, blue-eyed champions. Both stemmed from Greek mythology and both featured Amazons. They were both demi-Gods (well with Xena it was hinted at, but never confirmed). They both tussled with Ares at one point. Xena was even given the "Warrior princess" moniker lol.
I think it makes sense to base WW's costume on real ancient greek outfits. Gal's costume strikes...
Wonder Woman IS a regular Amazonian. Princess or not. I'm assuming she'll have a separate outfit with the stars kinda like Batman has the armored one Dark knight returns one. Either way it wouldn't bug me if they left them off. I agree the colors are a little muted though. But no biggie.
Also, there was Amazonians in Gladioator?
It'll probably be a while before it's made :/ damn.
I'm ok with this being its own thing. Would they really call this Justice League Dark though?
Chris Terrio means no David S. Goyer... Which is good. Really good. The future of the DCCU rests on JL's success. And removing Goyer was a great move in success's direction. So yes, BIG NEWS! :D
Sessy looking beast. Hope we get a full view of the suit soon. Also glad to know it's black & not blue!
His Hulk, Fantastic 4 and Daredevil cameos didn't do any good lol. He IS senile and his ego is through the roof if he thinks people go see Marvel films just because of his cameos.
Superman is easily the most iconic hero, while Batman is the most popular. Wonder Woman being the most popular heroine. Period. They'll do pretty well without his cameo. Even if word of mouth is mediocre PEOPLE WILL FLOCK TO IT!
@Porcelain_Chicken, my bad Foxtrot. Had an awkward double post thingy.
Reading through the comments in article it really gives you a sense of what this Neal guy is. Sounds like you're average internet troll tbh. Angry and keyboard warrior-ing the internet. I agree the outcome would have been catastrophic. The only edge Superman had over Zod (who was a trained soldier might i remind you) was that he was used to his powers. While Zod had just acquired his only hours earlier...
Weird double post... scroll down lol.
Look up the word sequel in a dictionary then come back. In short,
It's A sequel to Man of Steel. Calling people dumb when you yourself made such a trivial mistake is pretty sad.
Actually he's teasing Gambit's appearance in X-men 5. Channing Tatum does have the range of a block of cement after all. LOL JK Only joking.
And why can't 2 superheroes develop character at the same time again? Watchmen and Guardians of the Galaxy did well in that department. You're thinking too much into the idea of "marvel formula". See how BW came out in IM2? Or Hawkeye in Thor? Or Falcon or Warmachine or in Cap 2 in Im2? And how IM is set to appear in Cap3? Sometimes these characters bump into each other on other occasions other than the 1 Avengers movie every 3-4 years. It's why the MCU is so well receiv...