if nolan was on board there wouldnt be any need for a reboot .

seems obvious to me . They aint at least pretending they can replace a previous director's strong vision , with someone else and new . it's highly unlikely .

You can pull that off with continuity in books and tv series , but not in movies .

And whatever we say , the major and biggest audience for blockbuster movies doesnt have enough attention span to care for , let's say 8 movies within the same continuity anyway .

You can already see shocking example of the common moviegoer not even understanding how the marvel movies were tied together as a red herring for the avengers

i disagree. im not sure there can be a "poor" version of any comic characters, just different takes. batman has been explored by a million different writers since his creation and all have their own take. thats what helps keep characters interesting as well, why would i want to see batman in movies, comics, and tv shows if he is going to be the exact same thing every time?

weve seen batman cheesy with adam west. weve seen him with a fictional/artistic yet believable universe with burton, weve seen him completely sh*t the bed with shoo ( these movies sucked though, the interpretation of batman was still fine though ), and we've seen nolan try his best to ground bats in a more realistic universe. then you have a million more with the tv shows ( batman beyond, the batman, Batman: The Animated Series ( one of the best cartoons ever ) and many many comics....all different but all bringing something fresh to the character

i loved nolans film but ill be excited to see what soembody else does. id also like to see a better/more interesting bruce wayne this time. i thought burton/keaton handled both identities the best