Ive always been an Ironman fan and I always saw Ironman differntly than the way he is being portrayed through the movies. Thus Im not enjoying them. That and from a film makers stand point he isn't doing a good job at making movies at all. In fact Michal Bay looks like a king of story telling when compared to these films. Jon has some interesting ideas, but an overall boring scope, and no sense of writing at all.

LOL! Nice Michael Bay reference. I guess since I wasn't a big fan of the Iron Man comics, I go into the films with a little different view than most people. As a filmmaker myself, I really don't feel Jon is doing that bad. I don't think boring is the best way to describe it, perhaps, generic (maybe even cliche) but not boring. I agree there are aspects to the story-telling that needs to be fixed, but that's more of a script problem.

The things that bug me are like major story aspects he threw in. Like personally any film that revolves around politics is boring to me. Its an easy way out to make an easy story. Not only did he bring in politics, but he made up the politics which to a certain extent is fine, but he went way beyond that. Like he is trying to push Civil War (comics) into a film universe that isn't even there yet.

That and having Iron Man stuck up and "famous" is stupid to me. He never wanted that, all he wanted was a beer at the end of the day. He never wanted to help other heroes ever.

The main issue with Ironman 2 was Black Widow was way more interesting and had a better story arch than the rest of the characters, yet she was in teh film for like 10 minutes total....