Leto channels the Joker from the Batman animated series and the comics the best, Nicholson and Ledger were great but they were doing their own thing.

First Class was alright but it just created plot holes and made more of a mess to the franchise when they said it was part of the same timeline. Even after all that DoFP wibbly wobbley timeline stuff they still had inconsistencies in Apocalypse. It's not really the same when these films are sequels and that was a prequel "trying" to reboot something.

Wonder Woman looks pretty bad it's self. Gal Gadot is a problem herself so god knows what the film is going to be like although I honestly think critics won't be honest for two reasons 1) Pity vote - After reviewing 3 bad films they might know they have to give DC something and 2) A woman director, a main female lead and most supporting cast who are women...after Ghostbusters I could honestly see them scared to say anything incase they are called sexist. "Well I think Gal Gadot is not the best actress"...."OMG...S EXIST WOMEN HATING PIG"...."WHAAAA...NO ...I mean she's great I love her, she's the best actress out there 10/10"

It only looked like it was saved because The Last Stand was so bad...but to count it as the same timeline made it come off bad. It's like Origins, they just didn't think any of that through, like First Class it felt like it was supposed to be a reboot but they made it part of the same timeline. It shows me that they didn't think it through and it was all slap dash. Like why add Havok for example if Scott was in the originals and never once mentioned his brother, plus he was older then Scott while in the majority of the comics Scotts being the older brother. The Wolverine wasn't that good either, better then the first but that's all it had...oh plus Hugh Jackman, it's like Iron Man 2 and Iron Man 3. I god damn hated Iron Man 3 but the saving grace was RDJ. Funny how the best people for the roles get their own films and they are rushed resulting in them being pretty lousy.

I'm saying it's a possibilitiy with the amount of backlash die hard crybabies have been giving critics. They hate DC, they've been paid off, there's some secret agenda...maybe this is the chance to show them they aren't.

As for the Ghostbusters comparison that's a separate point from the first (not the pity good review). It just feels like if they said they didn't like it these die hard whiners coming up with these conspiracy theories about critics being paid off will use the "sexist" card to defend the film.

I mean critics trashed SS...rightfully so but despite not being like the characters. Margot acting and looking nothing like Harley and Will Smith being Will Smith not Deadshot they still praised them and said they "nailed it"...seems like it was to say something nice about the film and who better to give praise to then two of the biggest stars of the film who they probably don't want to p*** off.