It's funny that they don't realise Warner Brothers owns 30% of Rotten Tomatoes lol

Wouldn't they be better off directing their anger at DC for making films which are lacking and hyping them up to much which is worse then they end up being disappointing?

No no....Marvel MUST have paid all those critics off...every single one for the third time after MoS and BvS ¬¬

Do it, I'll be the first to sign. Who seriously listens to Rotten Tomatoes anyways!?? <_> A site that has Sharknado above something like The Godfather can't be all that great...

This comment seems REALLY off topic.

Why the hell did my comment get marked for being "Inappropriate"?

What the hell guys....seriously.

The problem with user score is that it can easily be altered by trolls. At least critics have some type of control. User scores are full of hate or blind fanboy praise. Unreliable in my opinion. For me personally, I go to Jeremy Jahns and Chris Stockman for an honest review. Even shmoes know are legit.

User scores are way off. Popcorn flicks are more likely to have good scores. Movies like the force awakens, the avengers, interstellar, etc... all appear in the top 250 on IMDb. They're all good movies, but none of them are even close to the top 250 movies ever made. I generally look at rotten tomatoes, metacritic, and user reviews. I also read a few to see how the complaints hold up. The new movie, Loving, had a reviewer that gave it a negative view basically because it's not politicized enough. To me that's actually a positive. Most other reviews are positive, both user and critic.