SR
Batman V Superman – which is finding itself even more controversial than its predecessor – is a killer versus killer scenario. That label is unfair as we’ll explain but it’s not inaccurate. When you see Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice, you’ll see a movie where director Zack Snyder doesn’t hold back (much) in showing Batman ending lives. He even uses guns, and for comic fans, we know Batman morally objects to gun use because it was a gun that ended the lives of his parents as a youth. The movie will remind you of that too.
With the new The Crow remake coming soon, we take a look back at the 30-year-old cult classic original–and where the stars are now.
Kaam Chalu Hai Review: Based on true events, this movie is thought-provoking and inspiring
Rebel Moon Part 2 Review: This movie doesn't feel anything new or worth remembering, which is a shame.
Batman kills people by this point in Snyder's universe because he likely broke his code as he does in the comics later in life either thanks to trying to avenge someone (Jason Todd, Batgirl) or merely because he's given up on humanity entirely. That's awfully generous for a Zack Snyder film, but it makes more sense that Batman kill than merely cripple people in this universe and leave them to die by agonizing injury.
can we stop putting spoilers in headlines around here?
Let's not forget that Keaton Batman pretty much killed the Joker and Penguin whilst Bale-man killed (or chose not to save) in Batman Begins so there's definate cinematic precedent in that sense.
Fúck this shít! @$$holes, can't make an article without putting a spoil on the title!? bunch of incompetents!
Synder obviously doesn't get Batman