Was Avengers 1 and 2 spoiled for you too when trailers revealed Loki, Aliens and Ultron and Vision. Double standards much. smh and they have already said doomsday only part of the surprise.

It spoiled everything?! No way!!!! I don't have time to search it up again but can you answer me a few basic questions please?! :D

What role does Aquaman play in the grand scheme of things?
Is Flash really in this?!
Victor Stone was confirmed to be in this, does he ever become Cyborg or is it hinted at all?
Any mention on the new on Green Lantern?! And where was he during the events of Man of Steel?
How is Doomsday created? Zack said his mythology would be explored so it's obviously not just Lex poking around Zod's insides!
Is there a third bad guy?! Zack teased a bigger badder threat?! :0
How long is Wonder Woman's role? And is Gal a good Wonder Woman?!
Is Eisenberg a good Lex and is his "goofball Eisneberg-ness" really just a public persona?
Do you feel it touched upon the MoS destruction well or was that sorta skimmed through to focus on the current events?
Does this movie confirm wether the events of Suicide Squad happen before or after this movie?
How does Lex lose his hair? Eisenberg really seemed to like that part of the movie?!

Maybe I exaggerated a bit there, lol, but the trailer did give away the plot in a more succinct manner. MoS's trailer didn't give away much and I loved every minute of the movie. Only Superman, Batman, and WW have a real part in the film. Cameos are great but it's not gonna be the integral part of the film. I mean Thanos' first appearance didn't define Avengers 1 nor did Howard the duck in GoTG. Eisenberg's a great actor- but I don't like the direction he's taking with Lex. Put makeup on his face and he'll remind you of Heath Ledger's joker.

All they have in the movie are Batman, Superman and introducing Lex and Doomsday who else are they cramming in there besides maybe a JL cameo possibly. You do know what the word Cameo is right?

Batman
Superman
Lex
Wonder Woman
Doomsday

Possibly (Rumored)

Cyborg
Aquaman
Bizzaro
Oracle or Robin depending who she's playing
A Flash cameo

DC is doing what in their second film? Giving us a prequel to a Justice League movie? I honestly don't understand why Marvel fanboys assume DC should follow Marvel's formula. Even if they did you guys would still find some reason to complain. Cyborg, Aquamn, and Flash will have cameos. Small screen time. The rest of the movie is all about Batman and Superman. And Bizzaro is not even in the movie.

"why Marvel fanboys assume"

Yes because anyone who criticising DC rushing ahead is a Marvel fanboy. It's like the PS vs Xbox thing, say one negative thing about either and suddenly you are the fanboy of one of them.

Anyway

"DC is doing what in their second film?"

Trying to shove in as many things as they can instead of slowly building it up.

You have Lex and Doomsday which is, apparently, "Doom-Zod". Possibly changing the origins and for what? Just so they have a quick way of adding him into the film. You only needed one villain. They are trying to treat it as a mini Justice League instead of slowly building up to the Justice League film. We should have had Man of Steel, Batman, Wonderwoman, Green Lantern, Flash and then the Justice League film which introduces Cyborg...and so on.

Oh and what is actually wrong with Marvels formula? Hell it's not even perfect, this was DC's way of doing it but making it even better. Marvel had no idea this was going to take off and they don't own the rights to all their characters if they knew BOTH of these things then I bet my entire live savings that Spiderman would have been in Phase 1 and Antman would have been included aswell with Hank Pym and at the end he sets up the Avengers along with Nick Fury. Even with Hank building Ultron as a subplot to use in the Avenger sequel.

So yeah if they did do "Marvels formula" and did it better then it wouldn't actually be their formula anyone but more of an improved one. Better, more structured, can do more since DC own all their characters.

"The rest of the movie is all about Batman and Superman"

And the point is it's their second film. Why feel the need to add Batman, do they think Superman can't hold on his own. Wonder Woman will be included aswell and will obviously play a big role judging by the trailer.

"And Bizzaro is not even in the movie"

Which is why I said "rumoured" /s

You know because of the most recent rumour.

@1.5.2 Cyborg, Aquaman, and Flash were already confirmed for BvS. That's why their casting was announced.

Do you also consider we also live in a different time period where nerd/geek culture is main stream hence why these movies actually make so much money vs when the superman/batman movies were released. Hence, some of these critics are fans of the source material too hence superhero movies are more well received then they were before both critically and financially.

where did i say i like DC movies more than marvel movies in my comment? or that i have this "hard on" for DC. i guess pointing out a simple double standard makes me automatically pick a side and i should stop watching marvel movies.

all i said was that when DC has x amount of characters in one movie, its bloated and people whine and complain that they shoving too many characters in one movie even though they only using as many as the original source material. marvel makes a movie with 10 times that amount, and its exciting eventhough they too are using the same amount as the source material. double standard? no?

DC leaves out origin stories for some characters, its the wrong move. they arent making standalone movies for each character. as if nobody knows who batman, superman, aquaman, WW are. marvel makes a movie with 60+ characters, suddenly nobody asks why there isnt 60+ origin movies for each character and its all good.

im simply pointing out the double standard amongst fans. i didnt state marvel fans/dc fans (unless you can specifically point out where i said "Marvel fans"). media is the biggest culprit of this double standard.

having standalone sequels is not always a good thing either. iron man 2 and 3 were mediocre at best. would you want 2 DC movies of that quality for the sake of having standalone movies because marvel did it? i dont think anyone wants that.

i didnt even bring up any of marvels numbers and i never claimed they were doing poorly either. so i dont know where you getting that line of thought from.

as for that dance scene, guardians was enjoyable but that dance distraction was lame unless you would rather watch batman v superman in an epic dance battle rather than a well choreographed action scene.