CB: Man of Steel (2013) relied on a lot of computer-generated imagery but for Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice director Zack Snyder wanted to "up-the-ante" by utilizing more practical effects and with the introduction of Batman (played by Ben Affleck) he was able to do just that.
With the new The Crow remake coming soon, we take a look back at the 30-year-old cult classic original–and where the stars are now.
Kaam Chalu Hai Review: Based on true events, this movie is thought-provoking and inspiring
Rebel Moon Part 2 Review: This movie doesn't feel anything new or worth remembering, which is a shame.
That's good to hear. Practical effects always age better. I hope they can apply as many practical effects to Superman and Wonder Woman as possible while only enhancing specific things with cgi. The audience will thank them in 20 years. Some of the cgi in MoS already looks off and the cgi in the first Avengers has begun to look terrible.
No cgi. Practical 100%
Nice.
People who say crap like "practical effects are always better" have no clue. Those people often have no idea how much CGI is added to a scene that they think is real. Practically every vehicle on the streets or in the skies in modern movies is CGI, even if the scene is just two people walking and talking in NYC. Buildings are added, removed or altered dramatically as well, and people think they're looking at the real deal. We have excellent capabilities for representing non-living objects in films now. Even modifications and additions of living creatures or people is excellent, so long as the proper care and attention are applied. What about Harvey Dent's face in The Dark Knight? The burnt half is all CG, and it looks extremely believable. As cited above, the effects used in the original Jurassic Park still stand up, simply because the artistry was spot on.
The reason a lot of CGI looks terrible is usually down to time and budget constraints, as CGI studios are over-worked and underpaid because of an extremely competitive market, often promising ridiculous delivery schedules for ridiculously low sums, with many vying voraciously for any studio contracts they can get (which leads to overburdening and thus poorer results). Often the artists willing to work in these stressful positions aren't as experienced as well, which ultimately leads to lacklustre results.
Ultimately, CGI can look almost indistinguishable (if not entirely so) from the real thing in the right hands. It's the lousy Hollywood culture of cheaping out and abusing the industry that results in the oft-cited crap (looking at you, Scorpion King).