WC
There aren’t many movies on popular critical aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes that have garnered the elusive 100% score. After all, to have a perfect approval rating means that every single critic who wrote a review for the movie would recommend it. To put that into terms that are quickly relatable, not a single movie from the year 2003 has earned a 100% rating. Such high accolade is not so easily achieved.
Video game movies have a long and unfortunate history. While things have gotten better more recently, the duds still drastically outweigh the hits.
Fans are now discussing whether this fact is an indication that film is superior to those movies or if it is a case of superfans "review bombing" the site.
There's a war taking place online. The audience and critics are on separate pages. But is IMDb better than Rotten Tomatoes for review aggregation?
Chappie can do this
Great list, could very well see all these doing good.
I honestly don't see what the big deal is in accomplishing a 100% on there anyways. Having some critics not recommend seeing the film doesn't discount what the average viewer might think of it.
Even some of those 100%-ers aren't all that great.