I agree with you. I think that Gina Carano would have been the best bet for the role.

Furthermore, I personally think it's an awful shame that instead of going a slow build/simmer in the DCU, they're kinda taking the spotlight off Superman in favor of adding all these other characters to what should be Man of Steel 2. Granted those roles just might be really small cameos but then if they were, why would they be announced as to who they are. Why not let the audience figure it out with a cameo.

Don't look at Gal Gabot as who she was but as who she will be especially since we havent seen her gym transformation.

its not nice thing to write someone off over some films they may not have shine thier best in considering we haven't seen her in other genres I will not personally insult said actress/actors in general over a single film etc etc.

As for the acting skill part of your comment it looks to me as i understand it that your basing the fate of her career/abilities over a single franchise films as if that determines whether she can be in said film of topic at hand that you refuse to give someone a chance to try and broaden thier skills or improve upon it .

You prefer gina because you like her not because you think she has any acting skill and its not entirely about looks fellow friend she is on the same playing field so your preference was just a personalise choice like anyone else yet youll say they are wrong either way from observement.

alas none of our "opinions" are right so well let the studios decide whats the best choice as a whole not a select few.

YOUR Logic is flawed. You're pointing out crappy MARVEL movies as a reason why a DC movie will suck. At least throw Green Lantern out there.

I highly disagree with everything you said bud & before you run for the disagree option & slam your caps lock to Kingdom Come let me explain why. I can think of a million reasons why Carano is a terrible choice but i'll just go with the big one you actually pointed out and glorify it for you.

Carano CAN'T ACT PERIOD. I mean, she was cast by Steven Soderbergh, a VERY good director, next to grade friggin A+ talent like Micheal Angarano, Micheal Douglas, Antonio Banderas, Ewan McGregor, and Micheal Fassbender YET still couldn't cut it next to all these stars. Her line were stiff & her face was wooden. Hell Channing Tatum managed to outshine her. Channing TATUM!!!

Meanwhile Gal nabbed the WW role auditioned against god knows how many other women including Olga Kurylenko & fan fave Jamie Alexande. AAAAAAAND was recently cast in John Hillcoat's (a very GREAT director BTW) Triple Nine, alongside Aaron Paul, Kate Winslet, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Norman Reedus, and Woody Harrelson. That's pretty impressive no matter how you cut it. Show's she might have more in her locker than just a pretty face given a half decent script. Can Gal flop in Triple Nine as hard as Gina did in Haywire? Of course. But at least give her a chance. Especially considering Gina Carano already ruined hers.

As for Gal's frame, she's being trained by the guy who trained Spartans & Kryptonians. I'm sure he can whip an Amazonian princess into shape. Jackman was pretty skinny in X1. But with help of a great performance it wasn't even an issue. Snyder is a visual perfectionist. Leonidas, Superman, Rorshach, The Comedian and everyone else he's ever cast have all looked great on-screen. Hell even in Watchmen he didn't shy away from having a nude Dr. Manhattan the entire movie. I'm very sceptical about both Gadot & Eiseberg but Snyder has my full confidence. If he can make Matthew Goode seem intimidating the Gadot & Eiseberg shouldn't be a challenge. Rant over.