WC
Another week, another example of why the ongoing DC shared universe is woefully misguided. At least this time they’ve mixed things up by throwing doubt on a movie that up until now looked like it could actually be good (which is equally surprising and disappointing).
Final Destination is a reminder of our mortality.
‘It Follows’ still lurks.
The Parenting Review: It starts off as a fun horror-comedy with a great cast, but loses its charm halfway through. The laughs fade, the scares feel predictable, and by the end, it’s just another forgettable haunted house story.
Yep, rather than wait and see how it all plays out on screen and the story behind everything, I'm going to blindly make a list of reasons why it's the worst version of something.
I'm most curious about how he'll do the voice.
Another compelling article from the scholarly website that is whatculture.
Amazing, people crapped on Michael Keaton when he was announced as Batman, people crapped on Heath Ledger saying there's no way he could top Jack Nicholson's Joker...
Jared Leto is a superb actor and he knows just how much is riding on playing a Joker after two previous fantastic actors. No doubt he will take the Joker and make it his own.
im not going to click on slideshow. but yes this joker looks wtf. cool new age of joker "modern times" we will see him play as joker in the film and im sure in the solo batman movie. see how he acts and if the tats and the teeth and everything else gets me side tracked (just turn off from the movie)
and yes people do have a right to flip out when their beloved character gets cast by an actor, these characters are 75yrs old people would like to see them do right by the character.
"#9: He's worse than Hitler lololololololol"
Aren't there anymore baddies in the DC world except the Joker?
The look is off (though the tattoos may just be promotional only), but let's be honest, he is the finest actor to ever take up the role. I'm sure he'll do well.
Everyone keeps commenting on the tattoos...but the screen capture of him being filmed in character didn't include these tats at all. Did anyone consider that the photo may have just been similar to a movie poster to get people excited for the film? It's a promo pic.
The worst version eh?
Have you SEEN the FILM yet?
Not even a single frame?
But, you have 8 reasons/ways why he is terrible?
Journalism at it's finest!
Writing a review on a character's performance and a film based completely on what?
A single picture.
I'll bet you were the smartest in your journalism class weren't you?
/
"8 ways"....ok
I think its really the picture that puts people off. He does not feel like the psychopath joker we are used to now in the other films. So we just have to wait see.