Amazing series. I think they don't deliberately copied anything from Heavy Rain. Heavy Rain is already kind of a love letter to film noir, which Mindhunter draws a lot from.
Does this count animated movies? Because I think they can go on forever with those. There's absolutely endless possibilities.
IDK, aren't movies making more money than ever before?
This is actually what I think as well. I'm not completely opposed to "retroactively" inserting some inclusion if it somewhat fits (some character can resurrect as different people, is a shapeshifter, has a never-mentioned-before life partner that fits his or her background). OK, whatever, I get it that back then it was a bit difficult do breakout of the usual white character. But why instead of that simply not create new ones that are actually not just tokens? We are not "b...
There is no defence. The plot points are fine, the writting and character development though, were atrocious.
Eh, Johanson is overrated. Zoe Saldana is ok. Jennifer Lawrence is better.
1 was good. 2 was great. 3 is bad. 4 is boring AF. 5 is popcorn fun. Don't know why Jurassic World is allowed to be dumb and get praised for it, but T: Genisys gets so much hate for being the equivalent to the Terminator franchise.
Only real tragedy in this movie was that the only plot twist that would be remotely interesting was spoiled in the trailers and not enough time was dedicated to it.
Considering her stand-alone comics is among the best selling ones for DC, I'm not so sure about that.
Angel's ending was good, but I felt that Buffy's ending was... well, an ending.
If he really did that on set... Isn't it a little unprofessional? "Kill me off, I don't want to do your movie which I signed for and read the script (or at least should've)".
TBH, Charlie's Angels deserved better. Not that it is a GREAT series or anything, but just because the movies were really THAT bad.
That being said, why not create a new franchise of female spies? Oh, well.
@Fox They did change Ben and Karen quite a bit, though. But I think they made improvements on their characters, TBH. Nothing felt pandered or too detached from the universe.
Terminator 3 and Salvation didn't f*** shit up? Really? At least this one is contained on itself. They can go ahead with it or not. Terminator 3 and Salvation are regarded as canon.
The consensus is that it is better than Salvation and Terminator 3, yet people are basically giving this a lower score than both. I truly cannot understand this...
Really? The second one was so easy to follow I honestly felt it was kind of cheap (even though the first already was, somewhat). I liked the time travel aspect of it though, adding value to the first one.
Lynda Carter was pretty skinny too back in the day. I'm more preoccupied with Gadot's acting than her appearance, TBH. I'm all for her making me believe she IS Wonder Woman. Here's hoping...
It'd be good, if the movie didn't happen in the span of 2 days. 2 days and he is banned from his land only to come back again in less than 48 hours with redemption and also having found the love of his life. Poorly scripted movie.
Captain America is a pain, Iron Man 2 and 3 are boring as hell and.. Does anyone even care about the first Thor movie? Safe to say that TASM 1 and 2 were better than all of those films, the thing is... It was Sony's only relevant superhero movie franchise, so mediocre wasn't gonna cut it.
Yep. And we all know how the writers "love" to explore possibilities and flesh out stories. Oh, wait... No, they don't. Dawn's premature leaving and Beth's death serving as the shock factor this series desperately needs to survive goes on to the hall of plotlines that TWD decided it was better to drop altogether rather than make an effort and make it more compelling through natural progression.
She'd be great! But rather she waited on Marvel. :D