980°

PlayStation Now Adds Downloading of PS4, PS2 Games

We are excited to announce that starting today, you will be able to stream as well as download PlayStation Now games to your PS4 system so that you can play both locally and offline, all with a single subscription.

Read Full Story >>
blog.us.playstation.com
DarkVoyager2044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

Awesome! I remember the rumors a while back about this. Glad they turned out true.

It’s too bad you can’t down load PS3 games but I understand why that’s not possible.

Dragonscale2044d ago

So true. That damn cell architecture lol.

Eonjay2044d ago

This is gonna be an essential service for PS5. Being able to steam and download the PS4 library is amazing. And its another confirmation that BC will be in PS5. PS5 will play PS4 games separately, or let you steam and download them with Now.

notachance2044d ago

@eonjay I still think the next PS and XB will go the smartphone route with mid-gen refresh and minimum requirement instead of separating games by generation, so future games will be something like min. PS4Pro /XB1X required to play, recommended console PS5/XB2.

S2Killinit2044d ago

Damn, now PSNow is a better service than what MS has.

tetsuhana2044d ago

@notachance
Not a chance.

2043d ago
darthv722043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

PS3 games will be playable on the PS5, I got a feeling that is going to happen. Making the PS5 capable to play (hopefully) 5 generations of games much like xbo is able to play 3.

Right now PS4 is only able to play 2 but that could change if Sony adds in PS1 support.

S2Killinit2043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

@Imgamby
But they are the same price. Also PSNow comes with both download AND streaming, with a much larger catalog. Also im sure more games will be added. As to first day releases i prefer a system that allows for compelling 1st party games. If Sony follows MS’s first day release, there will be no incentive for developing amazing 1st party games because the developer would lose money. In that regard, i say to hell with first day release, i want games.

rainslacker2043d ago

@Darth

I think that may be hoping for a lot. CELL is still kind of a chore to emulate, although the graphics stuff is more than possible on the current GPU's. Biggest issue is going to come from the games that used the CELL SPE's the way Sony intended, and do what is essentially a reverse GPU compute paradigm thing.

PS4 BC I think is a given since Cerny indicated before release it was one reason to go with x86. PS1 and PS2 should be more than possible without hardware, so emulation like MS has, although questionable if PS5 will support the CD physical media...and its even possible DVD media may not be supported. PS3 I think is a big maybe, but I highly doubt Sony is going to commission CELL/RSX chips to put into the system for native compatibility, and I think most people would prefer they spend that money on more beneficial things for the next gen...or maybe like I suggested last gen..make a 2nd SKU that has the required hardware for those that want it. Surely for what amounts to $50 in cost for them, they could charge $100 more.

bouzebbal2043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

i honestly don't know what to think of this service anymore. now it is only available on PS4 and PC.
They dropped Bravia TV and Vita.
Really kills the value of this service for many, no matter how great the content is..

One more thing, by being able to play PS2 games on my PS4 offline means that PS4 is PS2 capable.. Sony, just give that BC already!

darthv722043d ago

@bouz, well I believe the PS4 is not PS2 capable but rather the PS2 games are recompiled to be playable on the PS4. Like what MS has done with og xbox games and you get a full reworked game instead of just playing from the inserted media.

Hence why the PS4 does not let you just put the disc in and download the game like MS has done. Sony would rather make some $$ off the idea of giving you an improved game with trophy support.

2043d ago
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2043d ago
kevnb2044d ago

I think they could do it, but it would be even more difficult than getting 360 games running on the one.

2044d ago Replies(7)
Orionsangel2044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

They're emulating PS3 games for Windows. So it's possible. That could be added later.

Christopher2043d ago

Those emulations run at horrible rates and are mostly incomplete games with tons of bugs. It's possible, but not this generation and likely not the next.

Aceman182044d ago Show
Orionsangel2043d ago

@Christopher Well of course they run horrible they're not officially made by Sony. Xbox 360 emulators run horrible as well. Then MS made the best 360 emulator in the world and it runs on Xbox One.

Christopher2043d ago

Yeah, no... Even Sony can't emulate PS3 games on current gen x86 PCs. The issue isn't who is emulating them, the issue is the amount of low level programming involved in the Cell architecture and how intensive it is to emulate it, let alone run a game in parallel.

Unfortunately Examiner deleted their article with Tim about how much direction memory management went into God of War 3 on the cell architecture and how detailed and specific it was at the assembly language level. It's because of that specific memory management and attempting to emulate that on x86 that makes it impossible right now. It's very CPU intensive and the architecture is still used now for supercomputing in the process of advanced video processing and analyzing by the military because it can't be recreated using x86 architecture.

darthv722043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

@chris, IBM designed the Cell... you dont think they cant create an appropriate Cell emulator that runs on other hardware?

Besides, for as quickly as Sony was able to convert games like Uncharted series, TLoU and GoW3 from PS3 to PS4 makes me think they can do the same with even older games that werent even utilizing the benefits of the Cell to the fullest.

Loktai2043d ago

@Darth

I work in enterprise IT, the cell processor is used in P series IBM systems (power 7 etc) and the cell cannot be virtualized on other systems . Ibm cannot emulate the cell on other platforms unless you can emulate every core plus the overhead . Why can the Xbox be emulated? it has less than half the cores

CarlDechance2043d ago

"IBM designed the Cell... you dont think they cant create an appropriate Cell emulator that runs on other hardware? "

Probably not. Either way, they wouldn't just do it for free. I imagine the price tag would be extremely high for something that probably wouldn't work nearly as well as the original hardware. So why bother?

"Besides, for as quickly as Sony was able to convert games like Uncharted series, TLoU and GoW3 from PS3 to PS4 makes me think they can do the same with even older games that werent even utilizing the benefits of the Cell to the fullest. "

Porting games to newer engines is not the same as emulating processors, dude.

rainslacker2043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

@Chris

It's not so much the emulation of the low level code, rather the speed with which that code could be executed on the CELL itself.

The CELL is just a PowerPC core, with SPE's which use fairly standard Floating point math to execute a particular kind of code that is important to gaming.

The power of the CELL though came with just how fast the SPE's could execute the functions that it was designed to handle, and even in server technology today, CELL is unmatched in terms of single processor setups, and is blazingly fast when used in CPU arrays. The PS3 was a fast processor for certain kinds of data, and the x86 is a more general purpose processor which simply can't execute that kind of code as efficiently.

Some of this SPE work could be done through GPU compute, but that's would mean essentially emulating PowerPC code within a GPU, which is in no way set up to actually execute that kind of code efficiently, so if its not floating point the GPU compute would become more of a hindrance. Of course there are some caveats to this, as GPU compute borrows a lot of tech built from the CELL, but that's another topic altogether, and extremely technical...although interesting.

This would mean a lot of case by case scenarios, since there were many ways the SPE's could be used to increase efficiency and speed, and making an emulator for such a thing is not very easy compared to simply emulating the base code of a processor.

@darthv

IBM and Sony designed the CELL. I'm sure they can emulate the code, but the x86 hardware is a completely different paradigm when it comes to processing that it can't run fast enough on an x86. There are some functions on the CELL which aren't even possible on the x86 without extensive supplemental functions to translate something not just to x86, but back into CELL for the software use. What could take a few processor cycles to execute and send back to the game, would now take 10X the number of processor cycles because of how data is manipulated by the CPU, then converted between different types of machine code.

In short....an emulator is possible, but Sony and IBM can't defy the laws of physics or computer science.

Just because the current consoles can process more data at one time, doesn't mean that each function related to that data can be executed as fast, and when it comes to game programming which runs on tight timing interrupts, you can't just throw more data at it and expect to get the data returned when the game loop needs it.

"Besides, for as quickly as Sony was able to convert games like Uncharted series"

You're confusing a compiled build written in C code written in game engines designed to write machine code based on pre-set criteria based off provided API's to hardware level system machine code. The two things are completely separate from one another, and an emulated game would have to run the PS3 code, not a completely different compiled build of the game itself. A build which would also include changes to the source code because not all CELL functions are adaptable to the current systems design.

Christopher2043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

***IBM designed the Cell... you dont think they cant create an appropriate Cell emulator that runs on other hardware? ***

Not at this time. Possibly not worth ever doing it.

***Besides, for as quickly as Sony was able to convert games like Uncharted series, TLoU and GoW3 from PS3 to PS4 makes me think they can do the same with even older games that werent even utilizing the benefits of the Cell to the fullest.***

None of that was quick and it took months of time to recreate the games for the PS4 entirely, they were not emulations. They were full on ports. That alone should tell you everything you need to know about the possibility of emulating from PS3. It's easier to make the game for PS4 than it is to make an emulator just for one of them.

badz1492043d ago

@darthv

you do know that even for PSNow, Sony is still using the actual PS3 housed in bulks at their server centers? that's how complicated the CELL is to be replicated even Sony themselves are forced to use the original PS3 hardware.

"Besides, for as quickly as Sony was able to convert games like Uncharted series, TLoU and GoW3 from PS3 to PS4 makes me think they can do the same with even older games that werent even utilizing the benefits of the Cell to the fullest."

you can do a lot of things if you have the "SOURCE CODE" of the game! that's how they did it. they just changed the instructions into x86 architecture, not suddenly makes the PS4 able to emulate the CELL. Remasters are basically the same as BC on xbone. they don't magically allow newer hardware to natively emulate the old ones, just letting the newer hardware run old games running with modified codes.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2043d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2043d ago
SpaceRanger2044d ago

The true Netflix of gaming!
Streaming and Offline play.

This must have been what the PS4 update had set itself up for. It’s a really good move in the right direction.

ziggurcat2044d ago

I don't think the 6.00 update had anything to do with this - it would have been a separate thing since it's a separate app.

Kribwalker2044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

except that Netflix adds new release content consistently., and PSnow is strictly old games and paid for BC......They obviously have a PS2 emulator installed on the PS4, you’d think they’d allow you to use your old PS2 games then

gangsta_red2044d ago Show
SpaceRanger2044d ago

Netflix releases content they make, but 95% of their library are already released movies. So you’re only adding more to the point.

“...you’d think they’d allow you to use your old PS2 games then.”

Pretty sure that’s what’s next. Good thinking Krib!

@Gangsta_Red
“I have been told, no one buys a new system to play old games.”

No one disagrees that options aren’t good. PSNow has been around for a LONG time.

Not if you’re referrjng to what people would say about the Xbox focusing on BC. That’s because they hardly deliver new content throughout the year that’s their own. PlayStation is delivering new content and now adding even more options. But go ahead, continue with your arbitrary arguments Red.

TheUndertaker852044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

That’s just it. We know they have emulators running on PS4. They admit as much in the description for Grand Theft Auto San Andreas even. The PS4 version is nothing more than the PS2 version with some little alterations.

We also know they have a PSP emulator for PS4 as well.
http://n4g.com/news/2168610...

S2Killinit2044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

@krib
Lol dude its ok MS still has the second best service.

@gangsta
But those exclusives sure do sell a lot of consoles.

Christopher2043d ago

They don't have an emulator. It's the same as what Microsoft does where each game is encapsulated in its own VM environment and each one is tailored to run the specific game. This is why releasing new games take time and have a team that works to make them play on Xbox. I also think Microsoft, at least, likely makes them somewhat future proof in their VM methods.

I do absolutely wish there was a way for Sony to detect PS2 discs and allow people to download and play digital copies of those games, though. With this move, let's hope they are moving in that direction.

rainslacker2043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

They have a PS2 emulator, but the PS2 games available to download seem to be those that could be purchased separately with the trophy additions. Those use a wrapper to make an executable file to launch on the PS4 system. That's different than the ones that just run natively on the servers for streaming.

I assume that's how it is since that's what it seems to imply in the blog itself.

And I'd say that Sony is adding more recent stuff in there as well. Maybe not release day stuff, but some big PS4 games from this generation to be sure.

Otherwise, yeah, they should be able to allow it, but it'd have to be in the same way that MS does it with getting publisher approval and downloading the game itself, or maybe streaming. But considering how few PS2 games actually are available on PSN, it seems like its hardly worth the effort, which means that they'd either have to put up a huge digital catalog to choose from, or allow people to play directly off the disc. The huge digital catalog probably won't happen at this point. Playing off discs probably isn't relevant anymore considering that people either got rid of theirs, or kept the systems that could still play them.

TheUndertaker852043d ago (Edited 2043d ago )

@Christopher:
https://www.eurogamer.net/a...

https://www.wired.com/2015/...

Hackers have also shown they can “massage” Sonys emulator to run titles that the PS3 emulator wasn’t capable of.

Sony has admitted to having said emulators even. 😳

“This title has been converted from the original PlayStation®2 version to the PS4™ system. Consequently, there may be times where the title plays differently from the PlayStation®2 version, or where some features may not function properly. This version does not support PlayStation®2 peripherals, therefore some functionality may not be available.”
https://store.playstation.c...

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2043d ago
Sm00thNinja2044d ago

True netfilx of gaming? I still can't download PS3 titles this is HUGE but you're jumping the gun.

SpaceRanger2043d ago

How is that?
All of the following are the theee core features shared between Netflix and PSNow at this point or have:
- Streaming (All games)
- Huge Library if Content (past and current)
- Downloadable Content

kneon2043d ago

You can't download everything from Netflix either, so it's even closer to Netflix than you think.

Sm00thNinja2043d ago

Can I download movies on Netflix? I'm truly not aware. Like instead of streaming so how does this change anything? Unless you can? The library is vast does this include all titles? I already subscribe to PSNOW so this is huge for me but it lacks the vast library of games I missed from the PS3 Era which you can't deny sucks ATM.

KillBill2043d ago

@SpaceRanger - you are missing the KEY core feature of Netflix which is offering up new Netflix specific content. Otherwise people would be using really any Netflix like service available.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2043d ago
darthv722044d ago

Nice to see them switch from always online to having the option to download and play.

rainslacker2043d ago

I think it should have been done a long time ago. It's reasonable to assume that a good number of the people that use it now are actual console owners since Sony removed a lot of the non-PS branded hardware it could run on.

It'd be kind of cool if they allowed downloading PS3 games to the PS3 as well. I still have mine, and with that catalog thrown into the mix, it might actually make it worth the price of admission for me...although it'd likely be after the holiday game rush is over. The PS4 catalog is cool and all, but I already own most of the games they're offering, or that I want to play. The PS2 games are just the re-releases with the trophy support, and I don't think that's worth $100/year at this junction, particually since I own about 4 I haven't even gotten aroud to playing yet.

DarXyde2044d ago

I'll be impressed when I can just pop in my copy of Onimusha: Dawn of Dreams without attaching my credit card to PSN.

Obscure_Observer2044d ago

@DarkXyde

"I'll be impressed when I can just pop in my copy of Onimusha: Dawn of Dreams without attaching my credit card to PSN."

One day at a time. ;)

SierraGuy2044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

I've tried both mainstream services and for actual streaming of games not requiring a download...PSNow was leaps and bounds ahead of game pass.

Literally everything on game pass had to be downloaded.

darthv722044d ago

Yeah, that's how GP was designed. MS is working on a streaming component to arrive later just like how Sony went with streaming first and has now added a DL component.

gangsta_red2044d ago

"Literally everything on game pass had to be downloaded."

Yeah...that's really "literally" how it works.

SpaceRanger2044d ago

“Yeah...that's really "literally" how it works.”

Yeah that’s “literally” why no one sees it as anything close to a Netflix model.

gangsta_red2044d ago (Edited 2044d ago )

@spaceranger

That "literally" wasn't his point. Lol

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2044d ago
AngelicIceDiamond2044d ago ShowReplies(1)
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2043d ago
Doge2044d ago

I'll need to look into how I can sign up for it because this is big for Sony.

Only wish I could just use my credit card or PayPal :/

Doge2044d ago

Different account region from where I live.

@SuperSonic91

If using a PSN card works then I'll give it a shot. It usually told me I'd have to use a Credit Card or PayPal account to subscribe to PSNow. Even for the trial.

2044d ago Replies(6)
Show all comments (201)
210°

PlayStation beat Xbox cloud gaming users in 2021, new CMA data indicates

PlayStation dominated cloud gaming users throughout 2021, beating Microsoft's xCloud streaming by over 10%, but Xbox swings back at PlayStation in 2022.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Nanukas441d ago

Good, i want sony to feel heat. Ordinary people win from good competition.

BehindTheRows441d ago

“Good competition” is not something Microsoft offers often. You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better.

Nanukas441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

Agree. I wish sony would be more afraid of gamepass to get better games on ps+

Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

Phil Spencer started to acquire studios back in 2018, after that, Xbox Studios only had 5 studios. Now Xbox has 23 almost 5x more studios. Not to mention third party exclusives like Flight Simulator, Contraband and Project Dragon.

Plus, unlike Sony, Xbox Studios won´t be distracted with things like VR, all of their first party efforts goes towards Xbox first and foremost.

Sony so can expect a much more robust Gamepass in terms of first party and third party exclusives games from Xbox from now on.

Since Sony have less studios and won´t release their games day one on PS+, they better make sure andl deliver high quality games like Ragnarok. Because so far, 2023 hadn´t started well for them with Forspoken.

https://www.videogameschron...

Sony spent millions to secure a AAA third party exclusive game build from the ground up for PS5, not to mention more millions spent on market to be outperformed by a AA game which costs less than half on Steam, had an EPIC day one surprise announcement AND release with ZERO money invested on promotion and marketing.

If that´s not good competition, I don´t know what it is.

BehindTheRows441d ago

@Obscure_Observer

It isn’t.

Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

"It isn’t."

Oh yes, it is. You can bet your life that both companies cares about their money and investments.

The simple fact that Sony continues to pay multiple publishers to keep games out of Xbox forever, is nothing but a reaction to Gamepass.

Imo, Sony now fears that once their timed-exclusive contracts ends, those games will be available on Gamepass the moment the said games hits the Xbox platforms.

Sony fears the scenario where gamers realize that it´s not worth to invest in every single game released on Playstation at full $70 once they´ll be getting it for "free" on Gamepass eventually, just like Yakuza, Dragon Quest, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni, Persona series and more.

ARK 2 (exclusive on Xbox consoles), S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2( exclusive on Xbox consoles), Flintlock, Wo Long, Atomic Hears, Lies of P, Eiyuden Chronicle, Hollow Knight: Silksong. Minecraft: Legends, MLB 23...

Those are just some of the games that Xbox players will be getting for "free" day one while Playstation gamers will have to pay for all of it.

So at least you´re rich or something, Xbox players will be getting way more NEW games to play than you. That´s just facts.

BehindTheRows441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet.

As a fan of theirs, you should want them to do better and offer more than subscriptions services and unfulfilled promises.

tay8701441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

@obscure. Well Sony can't control 3rd party games quality, but their 1st party certainly trounces MS's. Spiderman 2 is going to a absolutely dominate the holiday season, just like ragnarok did this past holiday season. Sony easily has the best gaming studios out of the big three. It's.not Sony who has to worry about their 1st part output, it is MS.

MIDGETonSTILTS17441d ago

@Obscure: what AAA games would I buy an XsX today to play?

I own a ps5 and XsX, and I don’t know of one game that would have motivated me to buy an XsX ( I bought it to appease my dumb Xbot friends).

I bought a ps5 for Demon Souls (best looking game on consoles), Returnal (top 10 game of all time for me), and Dualsense upgrades for shooters (completely changes R6 for me).

So, can you illustrate how XsX is competing? I liked HiFi Rush a lot, High on Life too, but neither make we happy about the $500 I sunk into the hardware to play them.

Mr_cheese441d ago

Obscurer, you're saying an awful lot without talking much sense at all.

VR isn't a distraction, neither does it take games away from playstation. Sony have been building and harnessing studios just for this while working on their 1st party none VR titles.

Microsoft is fully committed to gamepass and that's fine for them and those that like to game that way. It will be an even better product if Microsoft can nail their 1st party games.

What I'd hate to see are more moves like the Activision and Bethesda purchases and attempts because it destroys the gaming ecosystem. I'd say the same for Sony as well because once the ball is rolling, they'll all start buying and diving gaming.

Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

"I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet."

Unfortunately for you, MS or Nintendo aren´t forced to play by yours or Sony´s rules. Fyi, Sony used to buy publishers back in the day. The only reason they aren´t doing it now is simply because they can´t.

As it is, Sony already owns 14.09% of Kadokawa´s shares while Tencent acquired 16% of the company's shares, which means 1/3 of the entire company ownership.

The only reason why Tencent owns more than Sony is because Sony couldn´t pay more for it. So spare me from this "victim complex" bs defense for Sony.

Phil acted as the "nice guy" for too long. To the point where stupid fanboys were all happy when Xbox acquired new studios and publishers, because the idiots were under the illusion that all future Xbox games would become multiplatform and be released on Playstation.

Yeah, they were stupid to the point of thinking that MS would turn into a third party developer for Playstation.

Reality hits hard and here we are. Now that they KNOW those games aren´t coming to Playstation, all that they can do now is cry and moan over games paid and developed by Microsoft to not be on their platform of choice.

They think they´re entitled to have anything and everything otherwise it´s not good competition.

Phil Spencer won´t stop. Be the Activision/Blizzard deal approved or not, he can just go after a single studio like CDPR for example and you´ll be here crying all the same.

I don´t care if Sony or Nintendo buys SquareEnix, From Software or even SEGA tomorrow. Because I have no problem buying products from those companies if they have the games I want. I care about games first and foremost. So don´t expect me to be on your sad place complaining about big a$$ companies running their business as they see fit.

Lightning77441d ago

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

But when they do attempt to do better ppl complain about it.

BehindTheRows441d ago

@Lightning77

What genuine attempts have people complained about?

Lightning77439d ago

With the whole Bethesda thing. There was article on here not too long ago talking about how Bethesda investment will pay off for MS. The whole comment section everyone was whining about how MS was taking games away. So when MS competes everyone here complains on here. No matter what MS hurts feelings. It's quite funny actually.

BehindTheRows439d ago

@Lightning77

In other words, outside of publisher acquisitions, they have not really attempted to compete.

And "whining" happens on both sides, so I hope you are just as entertained when people bitch and moan about moves Sony makes.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 439d ago
Crows90441d ago

Ps+ extra already has better games than gamepass. Just look at the highest scoring games...ps extra has more of them.

Obscure_Observer441d ago

Lol. What a joke.

PS+ relies on old games. Gamepass not only has day one first party games but also day one third party as well. Even from Sony. XD

S2Killinit441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

Exactly. “Day one” is a buzz word that makes these guys think they have a better line up but it has not amounted to much. If you look at what they have at any given time on their service its not that rosy. Not to mention “day one” also exists on PS plus just not for the first party AAA story games (which is fine w me as long as they continue making the hits).

Check out their list of day one releases for all the years they had gamepass. Its a joke.

Crows90441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

@obscure

I'd take good old games then new Bad games. Besides that wasn't his point and that has nothing to do with what I claimed. The op said that they should offer better games but they already offer better games. He did not say new games. Or even New Quality games. But to your point, I know that game pass lovers do enjoy their day one bad or mediocre games. It's all about value with you guys and not quality

GamingSinceForever441d ago

Some are going ape shit over Hi-Fi Rush but completely forgot about the Tokyo Wire dud the same developer last released. My point being there are hits and misses.

441d ago
441d ago
Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

" It's all about value with you guys and not quality"

Lol. Your false narrative didn´t aged well.

All Metacritic scores for day one first party games
.
Ori and the Will of the Wisps 92 on Metacritic
Flight Simulator 90 on Metacritic
Forza Horizon 5 92 on Metacritic
Halo Infinite 87 on Metacritic
Grounded 85 on Metacritic
Pentiment 87 on Metacritic
Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition 87 on Metacritic
Hi-Fi Rush 88 on Metacritic

And that´s only from first party games/IPs on Xbox series consoles.

So much for your "quality vs quantity" BS narrative.

Oh, and we "Gamepass Lovers" also love old quality games as well. I also can give you a large list of high quality third party on Gamepass. Just ask. ;)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 441d ago
GamingSinceForever441d ago

@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure.

Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly.

Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming.

Crows90441d ago

They're so anxious to try to nail Sony on something that they'll even bring up third party developers not under Sony. Oh look this time's exclusive that wasn't developed by a Sony studio was bad so Sony doesn't know how to do good games.

441d ago
Obscure_Observer441d ago

"@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure."

In no moment I said it´s a first party game. Both Forspoken and FFXVI are exclusive Playstation 5 games which Sony invested large sums of money to secure to their platform. Just like the original Spiderman from Insomniac. (which till this day Sony fans treat it like a first party/IP)

So it´s pretty obvious if the game fails, Sony also fails and loses tons of money which could had been invested on first party games.

"Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly."

True.

"Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming."

Also true. The same can be said about FFXVI, imo.

Abear21441d ago

The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does.

Obscure_Observer440d ago

"The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does."

Couldn´t agree more

BehindTheRows440d ago

The Switch is leading the PS5 because it launched three years prior. PS4 won last gen is all forms (money made, units sold, software totals).

No hate for Nintendo though, as they are another company who actually puts out quality games in high numbers, but just a little perspective.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 439d ago
Orchard441d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

From 20-30% up to 60-70%? That’s some crazy growth. Probably thanks to Fortnite.

SurgicalMenace441d ago

That's what's up, young fella. You feel better now?

The Wood441d ago

All the other stats dont matter. Especially the ones where ps is tearing xbox a new one

441d ago
Obscure_Observer441d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

Probably one of reasons why Sony won´t return Activision´s calls.

BehindTheRows441d ago

Oh, yeah, THAT must be it….

Outside_ofthe_Box441d ago

You're not asking for numbers now, I noticed? 🤣

Orchard440d ago (Edited 440d ago )

Oops, somebody didn't read the article.

This isn't a "YoY increase". It's market share, so we know they had 60-70% of the streaming market.

MIDGETonSTILTS17441d ago

That’s why we game: to celebrate YoY growth!

Three cheers for first-party content-starving fueling third party max’s and subscriptions.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 440d ago
Tacoboto441d ago

What a clickbait headline. Why mention 2021, when the tides turned in 2022 for the obvious reason of one company making the Cloud service one of their biggest marketing pushes throughout the entire year while the other company was able to promote the games they had coming out?

And it's imprudent to suggest crazy growth when we only know proportions - did Xbox grow its proportion by attracting from the competitors' bases, did their marketing pay off and attract new users, or did cloud gamers on competitors just not play as much? The MAU figures don't point to shifts as significant as the Cloud proportions do, and Microsoft's lack of raw subscriber numbers that they happily boasted about in 2021 is telling too.

320°

56 Games to Leave PS Now in May Including Metal Gear Solid 4

The PlayStation Brahs:

"Playstation Now will soon cease as exist as it combines with PlayStation Plus to be one super subscription, titles that won't carryover to the PlayStation Plus revamp will begin to leave the service in May."

Read Full Story >>
theplaystationbrahs.com
Orchard729d ago

Wait, what? I thought PS+ premium would carry over the games from PSNow?

Also this basically leaves MGS4 dead in the boneyard unless you play via RPCS3…

TGGJustin729d ago

That was never going to be the case. Sony said that Premium would have 340 PS3, PS2, and PS1 games. There are like 400 PS3 games alone on PS Now right now so it was obvious some of them weren't going to carry over.

darthv72729d ago

If they are just combining forces... there is no reason why any games would leave. Unless they were already planning on removing them regardless of the merge (licensing issues).

Orchard729d ago

MGS could be licensing I guess - isn’t the HD collection still unavailable / in licensing hell?

I’d like to think Konami are yanking everything MGS because they’re about to announce a 1-5 collection but… we know Konami better than that.

TGGJustin729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

I forgot to include PSP in my comment. So yeah you can see that when Sony says there will be 340 PS3, PS2, PS1, and PSP games while there are currently 400 PS3 games on PS Now that a good chunk of those current PS3 games are going away. They aren't just rolling them all onto the new PS+ otherwise the number would be much higher than 340

Orchard729d ago

Yeah I guess I just never really did the math on the numbers they announced so this caught me off guard.

Eonjay729d ago

PSnow is a platform and it will not exist after next month. Them being on one service doesn't automatically mean that they will be on another service. Contracts are drawn up and compensation may include things like per player reimbursement. Therefore you shouldn't automatically expect a game to go from one platform to another.... if Sony can strike a deal with Konami then the game will come to plus (if it already hasn't been decided).

But to be clear all PSNow games are leaving the service because the service will cease to exist.

JackBNimble727d ago

400 ps3 games that you have " no Choice" but to stream, doesn't make me want to upgrade ps+ . As it is , if you keep the basic ps+ you're going to lose1of the 3 games a month to begin with.

Nothing here for the new upcoming service seems like a worthwhile subscription.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 727d ago
ApocalypseShadow729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

Or, you know, you could play it on an actual PS3.

If you don't have one there's almost 90 million systems to track down, cop one and do that.

Here's the game too
https://www.ebay.com/itm/40...

Orchard729d ago

Is that you Don Mattrick?

The ideal solution would be a proper back compat implementation.

I shouldn’t have to crack out my 16 year old console to play a legendary game like MGS.

Also MGS was basically a PS franchise yet somehow it’s now basically an Xbox franchise if you want to play it nowadays.

Hopefully the new “preservation” team at Sony tackle this problem.

mkis007729d ago

Orchard

4 isnt on xbox. Incomplete series on xbox. Pc you would need now.

Orchard729d ago

@mkis The PC is always the place where you can get everything thanks to emulators etc.

But still, XSX and XB1 plays substantially more metal gear games than any other recent console, so my statement stands true.

King_Noctis729d ago

Or you know, you could play it on the console that you ACTUALLY HAVE without having to resort to ebay to buy a a console from two gen ago with scalper’s price.

itsmebryan729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

I have a OG PS3 (big boy) just gathering dust. I think it even plays PS2 games. I guess I'll put it on eBay.

thornintheside729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

so basically throw money at the problem.

sure it works, as long as not everyone is doing it. Is it ideal?....maybe for the sellers

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 729d ago
ApocalypseShadow729d ago

Oh. So orchard can lie and say that the only way to play the game is through an emulator. Which is false.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/13...
Here's a console for $50 and 7 games. Buy MGS4 above and that's 55 bucks before shipping. Can play it forever.

Orchard729d ago

“Also this basically leaves MGS4 dead in the boneyard unless you play via RPCS3…”

Looks like what I wrote is accurate if your only alternative is to go on eBay and buy a console from 3 generations ago which is no longer manufactured.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.

TravsVoid729d ago

I agree you should buy a PS3 if you are really interested in it's games but don't come on here linking to a eBay auction that has a price that will definitely increase before it ends and act like that is what they sell for. More accurate prices seem to be around $100.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i....

Only reason I want PS3 emulation on PS5 is because a lot of the original games aren't even 1080p, some even sub 720p and we could see these games up to 4k and smoother framerates on PS5.

Z501729d ago

He forgets. Some of us still have PS3's. So, RPCS3 is NOT the only way.

SonyStyled729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

Orchard, PSNow has 800+ games. PS+ Premium was announced for 700+ games. Some games were expected to be removed as one service cancelled and combined for another, and now we know which ones. What are you so surprised about, or did you not know PS+ Premium was loosing 100 games from PSNow while simultaneously being compared to a Gamepass competitor?
And yes actually, a lot of lifetime PS gamers have a PS3. I have one in my living room with the rest of my consoles and one in my bedroom. They aren’t like ancient record players today like their competing consoles. The PS3 came with features we expect today in a new device that were very premium for 2006 hardware. I can use my PS3 as a blu-ray player in 2022. I can’t with my 360 since 2005. I can also put MGS4 in my PS3 in 2022, or any of my 220+ on the game shelf.

I think you’re scaling PS gamers abandoning their prior consoles at the rate Xbox gamers did with the 360 and One. If you are a gamer and enjoy PS, chances are you don’t have to ‘crack’ out a 16 year old device and suffocate on the floor in a web of cords around your neck wishing we were loyal to Phil Spencer to swoop in like Superman to save us from imminent death

729d ago
outsider1624729d ago

I sure hope MGS4 comes to PS pass or whatever. It's the one game i want to replay. Man i loved that game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 727d ago
Petebloodyonion729d ago

It's actually a lot of games that will leave at the same time.
Probably to leave some space for the PSP games that are gonna be added to the premium service.
As for MGS4, I would expect Konami to be behind the move.

TheColbertinator729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

Unfortunate that MGS4 is leaving regardless. Played it with PSNow on PC and enjoyed having one of my favorite PS3 games to play again.

TravsVoid729d ago

It's going to suck if these PSP and PS2 games they are referencing are the few already released on PS4 store which were included with PS Now.

Cackocacho729d ago

Ah, yes. Bask in the "service" era. Where what you see today, is not what you'll see tomorrow, thanks to an overcomplicated system.

The "service", is simply, off the charts.

gangsta_red729d ago

Complicated how?

Also, you can always buy the game. Just like other services that offer third party content, they are on their for a limited time or however long the contract holds.

BrainSyphoned729d ago

Well, yes, when I subscribe to a service I hope to have different games cycle through. PS Now gives you a time frame to finish the games you want to try and Xbox is generally a year for most titles. They both give warning when titles are leaving. There are multiple web pages dedicated to each service if you need help figuring out which carton of milk needs finished first.

TravsVoid729d ago

Big difference between PS Now games leaving that are only available for streaming and games you can purchase even if they leave the service. Every game on Game Pass you can purchase without a subscription unlike PS Now.

thornintheside729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

im not really sure how the complexity of the PS3 architecture, and the "service" era are related. They seem like two completely separate entities with no interaction worthy of mentioning. Maybe you meant it as a problem that can exists in both entities.

Vengeance1138729d ago

So when games leave PS Now, it's a huge issue but when games leave GamePass it's just fine? All subscription services have games / movies leave all the time.

Vengeance1138729d ago

Everyone whining and crying in this comment section?

TravsVoid729d ago

You can still purchase every single Game Pass game regardless of if it's on the service. If a PS3 game leaves PS Now it's gone for good, do you understand the difference?

Bathyj728d ago

I do.
You're saying owning a game is better than renting it. I agree.

King_Noctis729d ago

I think it is the other way around.

GoodGuy09729d ago

This is why I dislike subscriptions lol.

Show all comments (47)
450°

This PlayStation Now 12-Mos. Sub Link Is Still Live at $59,99, and Nets a Huge PS Premium Discount

Get PS Plus Premium at half off the price by subscribing to PS Now for 12 months! Sony has pulled the annual offer on PSN, but here are live links offering it for US and UK.

Extermin8or3_752d ago (Edited 752d ago )

Umm ever consider it will probably just give you the basic ps plus for one year and you will need to upgrade to get the premium one?

porkChop752d ago

No, I believe Sony stated that existing PS Now subs would be converted to PS+ Premium subs.

Nitrowolf2752d ago

they confirmed that PS NOw Subs would convert into Premium. So essentially pay $60 now and come June u get PS Plus, and all the other perks in premium at half the original cost

Gamer75752d ago

For us here in Aotearoa PS+ Premium isn't going to be available straight away so we will have the deluxe version of it instead

Teflon02752d ago

You can ignore the fact they literally specified PS Now users will get converted to premium at no extra cost lol

Silly gameAr752d ago

They could give it to us for a dollar to get those numbers up before it launches.

Just kidding.

Andrew336752d ago

Hahahah so funny.

Just kidding.

Silly gameAr752d ago

Hey, I give 2 ishs what you say!

Just kidding.

rippermcrip752d ago

Microsoft has been way more desperate than that. All you have to do is let your subscription lapse and you can sign up for $1 again.

They've had countless promos giving away free weeks and months with all kinds of crap (cereals, poptarts, drinks, chips, candy).

brewin752d ago

You think that's desperation but it's how you get people hooked on your service. Once people have it for a while they're going to want to keep it. I don't know a single person that has a game pass subscription that has let it lapse. I've been out of my free zone for about 6 months now. I keep finding the 3 months cards for 20 bucks so every time I see that deal I buy 2 or 3 more more. I'm sure Sony will have some promos for their service too.

rippermcrip751d ago

There's a difference between a free/discount trial for new subscribers vs letting a user let their subscription lapse and then immediately sign up for the free trial again.

No subscription services do that except GP.

Everyone you know has signed up for GP and then never let it go? Ya right. They'd have 100 million active subscribers if that were true.

gerbintosh752d ago

Don't let the link open in the app, it doesn't work. Open it in a web browser and it will work

excaliburps752d ago

This. You need to open in a web browser or it won't load.

theindiearmy752d ago

The link in the article goes to a page that says "Not available for purchase." When I click on the link from the Twitter post, it works though. https://twitter.com/Wario64...

IanTH752d ago

Good catch. I even almost went ahead and did it, but I question if I really, truly need any more games to play than I already have lol. I tend to kind of underutilize subscription game services.

theindiearmy752d ago

At the end of the day, it's $60 for PS+ essentials to play online multiplayer anyway. So may as well stack up on this and get access to the games for nothing more.

jlove4life752d ago

App won't load and ps Now Not available for purchase upon opening website

IanTH752d ago

See theinidarmy post above, clicking the link from the tweet actually does work. So if you're interested, give it a shot.

Show all comments (25)