Put simply, precedence has been set, and Sony and Microsoft might just continue offering iterative consoles that evolve their existing hardware platform with their upcoming consoles
Veteran game designer James Montagna is directing this new project and apparently has a new outlook on game design after teaming up with Nintendo
The new Nintendo-focused emulator for the iPhone is now available with support for several classic systems.
Won't belong before Nintendo bangs on Apple's door to have the emu removed. Like I say you take down one six more take it's place. Problem is people are putting emu's on such stupid platforms. The good emus are the ones not on stupid platforms like a red target. The good emu's are word of mouth and keep a low profile.
Cord Smith, the former director of marketing for Compulsion Games' well-known title We Happy Few, has gone through quite a change since leaving the studio. This is represented by his new indie platformer Always In Mind, which takes players into a bizarre dream world full of fantasies inside the head of a little boy named Teddy. Sector got the chance to ask the industry veteran a few questions about his inspirations for the game.
The problem with that though is where is the line drawn when developers can freely start to work on games that take full advantage of the better tech in the newer versions of those consoles? They'll never be able to properly do that with like one or two versions holding them back.
At least when you say "Oh the PS5 has been announced" it's a warning to people to go "Next gen is here, devs are going to be moving on, save your pennies up for the new console"
This is more of an opinion than anything else, one i wouldnt see sony or microsoft trying to sell you on, first its sales since new console means sales, better loocking games doesnt have the same effect at that scale, second is if said game works on iteneration 3, means 1 and 2 are holding the newest one back, means it will be harder or disregarded to reach full potential and just bump in overall quality of picture, backward compatibility is talked, but its not that hard to implement if sony wants to. Third is exclusivity, one of the biggest reasons people buy new consoles is what exclusive you can play on your new toy that you could never do on your old one.
There's nothing wrong with doing a half step on the middle of the generation since more options arent a bad thing, but if one keeps doing more than necessary it will lose the message and confuse buyers (remember, normal people who dont come to sites or parents wont be able to tell whats the difference), i could go on but there's nothing to win and possibly a lot to lose to just keep releasing the same thing with a different word at the end of the package.
It seems only logical that 3 years after the PS4 Pro comes the PS5 since the Pro was released 3 years after the initial system. Sony sticking to a 6 year cycle. 6 years between base units and then 6 years between upgraded units. MS could likely go for 8 year cycles seeing as there was a 4 year gap between the base and the X and then in 4 years would be the next xbox (8 years after the xbo base unit) followed by an upgrade 4 years after that (8 years after the X released).
If they do this I'm done with console gaming. I have no interest in the PS4 Pro or Xbox One X, to be honest I think they're pointless
Rubbish.