940°

Call of Duty WW2 looks Brilliant in this Screenshot Comparison with Battlefield 1

Check out some screenshots from Call of Duty WW2 compared with Battlefiled 1 after the break.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
UCForce2548d ago

Call of Duty WW2 and Battlefield 1 are both look beautiful. Now I know Forstbite 3 engine looks more superior than COD engine. But for example like AW, that game used custom house engine and it look way better than BO 3 and IW. This COD WW2 custom house engine is seem been upgraded.

seanpitt232548d ago

The thing is you know this game is going to have a sh#t tonne more content than BF1

_-EDMIX-_2548d ago

Nope.

COD just lacks the same variety to actually have more content. I mean...you are talking about a game with smaller maps, no vehicles etc.

They are DIFFERENT GAMES! The only thing both games have in common is a gun....annnnnd thats it.

oof462548d ago

@EDMIX: I think he meant how CoD has single player, multiplayer and co-op.

boomtube19872548d ago (Edited 2548d ago )

@EDMIX As a seasonal COD player. I don't want large scale huge maps and tanks like BF in the warzone were u can run miles and miles without encountering a single player. CoD is all about small tight maps. Where Run and gun gameplay is king. No Bull$*** tanks and armored vehicle in CoD. This will make most of us CoD fans angry. This is NOT Battlefield. You want that type of game. Stick with BF. Keep CoD...Call of Duty. Thats why us COD guys buy it every year. They don't need to change what makes it addicitive and better than any MP shooter alive. They just need to stop doing future with Jetpacks and move to WW2 to Present settings.

UCForce2548d ago

No, I prefer simple and basic. That's why I like about COD game.

samden2548d ago

@boomtube1987, have you played a Battlefield game? You don't run miles without encountering enemies, at worst you run for 30 seconds if you spawn yourself on the opposite end of the map. If you spawn yourself on a point closer to the combat then it's not a problem.

Munnkyman2548d ago

@boomtube it's seems you have never played battlefield one

Mithan2548d ago

Disagree. Different games btw. One is supposed to be a realistic shooter based on large maps with vehicles and more strategy. The other (COD) is more of an arcade shooter focusing more on quick reflexes and tight maps.

I will take BF1 any day of the week as it is more my style, that doesn't mean that COD sucks, it just means I don't like that tight quarter extremely fast paced combat.

No Way2548d ago

@Boomtube - That is not even near the truth. Besides, World at War had tanks..

That worked out just fine.

andibandit2547d ago

Im looking forward to the "Spawn enemy player right behind you" content.

brich2332547d ago (Edited 2547d ago )

1 map in Call of duty is like a closet from a battlefield map lol

Mroc132547d ago

I agree with you and I rate BF higher than COD by far. I went back to BF4 after BF1 just became boring. Nothing to unlock. You get battlepacks with skins. Bullcrap

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2547d ago
Tear1112548d ago

The real problem with Forstbit ( I'm not sure if the problem from the engine or from the team) is the engine have a less textures from COD and a lot of game glitches and bogs , even the polygon call if duty have more than BF , these issues are common with every Forstbit engine like Mass effect when they switched to DICE engine we saw the game became horrible and even Medal of honor and Medal of honor airborn was running on Unreal engine 3 and it was great , but when they moved to DICE engine in Medal of honor war fighters we saw the game full of glitches more than the last two games.

Allsystemgamer2547d ago

You don't understand game engines at all.

Kingdomcome2472547d ago

I typically just scroll on by comments such as yours, but yours was particularly uninformed, and incorrect. What gave you those ideas, or did you merely regurgitate the uninformed opinions of someone else?

2548d ago
Bathyj2548d ago

Geeze, already? Wait till we see some gameplay.

Thunder_G0d_Bane2548d ago

Exactly people building hype with no gameplay. Lets see cods new paint on that ancient quake 3 engine.

UCForce2548d ago

I don't know about that. Sledgehammer Games have better tech and equipment than IW and Treyarch.

starchild2548d ago

You are too caught up in the names of graphics engines. Who cares what they are called? It's about what they can do. And engines evolve all the time. Uncharted 4, for example, was technically made on the same engine as the last gen Uncharted games, but it still featured all kinds of graphics techniques the last gen games lacked. It didn't stop Uncharted 4 from being one of the best looking games around.

Honestly, don't get hung up on the names of graphics engines. That doesn't begin to tell the whole story.

SaviorCeez2548d ago

That reveal trailer was "in-game footage"

Thunder_G0d_Bane2548d ago

In game cutscenes mean nothing to me.

We need Gameplay, someone using a controller not cutscenes.

81BX2548d ago

Ur right bathyj.. but I know bf1 is boring as hell solo. Cod never has been boring. Crappy at times but never boring lol

Bathyj2548d ago

Call of Duty started as amazing campaigns. Waaaay back in the day I did play PC for a little and CoD 1 & 2 were my favourites in the series. Yeah they had MP, but it definitely wasnt the focus. That all started with Modern Warfare, which wrecked the series for me but I get it, it was already stale with CoD 3. I have high hopes for CoD:WWII, I hope it follows a similar line to Band if Brothers and goes all the way from Normandy to The Eagles Nest. Gotta love that view.

81BX2548d ago (Edited 2548d ago )

For me MW was the game that got me into cod. Before that I loved MOH.

Sunny_D2548d ago

I thought the trailer looked amazing. Maybe they finally upgraded the graphics. The story looks to be very promising and with it being boots to the ground, I might pick this up.

UCForce2548d ago

Well, Sledgehammer Game have better tech than IW and BO 3.

2548d ago
Father__Merrin2548d ago (Edited 2548d ago )

Ww2 will dwarf bf1 totally, this will be the game to get this year.

Look at the paltry player counts on bf stats users are leaving every day

Akira20202548d ago

As compared to Infinite Warfare's stable player base? LMAO!?

Liqu1d2548d ago

COD WW2 is going up against Battlefront 2 this year. I'm more interested in Battlefront 2 now that EA has dropped the season pass.

Paytaa2548d ago

And it's more like the OG Battlefront games in general.

2548d ago
Liqu1d2547d ago

Maps and modes will be free to avoid splitting the playerbase. That is how every MP game should be.

oof462548d ago

It's too bad CoD hid the player count, so we could make a fair comparison.

2548d ago
Show all comments (92)
60°

Exploring the Artistic Vision of Famous Concept Artist David Brochard

In this interview, we will delve into the creative process of David Brochard. Behind the scenes with concept artist David Brochard, showcasing his creative process in gaming industry from Call of Duty to Dark Souls 3 and Star Citizen. Discover how his passion & skills bring immersive worlds to life.

Read Full Story >>
gamerhub.co.uk
439d ago
70°

DICE Needs To Recapture The Magic Of Battlefield 1 In The Next Game

For DICE to succeed with its next game, it has to return to the roots of the franchise. Atmospheric map design, clear and defined class-based gameplay, attention to detail, and total chaos. Battlefield 1 feels like every rock, every glint on your sniper rifle, every falling brick from a collapsing church, has been painstakingly considered. So much care went into the design of the game, from its soundtrack to its costume department. To stand a chance alongside the behemoths of Treyarch and Infinity Ward, DICE needs to recapture what made their old games so brilliant, otherwise it’s all over.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
LordoftheCritics522d ago

"DICE Needs To Recapture The Magic Of Battlefield 3 In The Next Game"

/Fixed

...on a serious note, DICE needs to remove the Battlefield name.

isarai522d ago

Eh, bfbc2 was the peak for me, only ad dogfighting and the accommodations that come with it. Every BF after that was such an unsatisfying progression system for weapons and gear for the classes, 90% of the guns feel exactly the same when you unlock them, just felt boring in comparison. Not to mention the gimped destruction as the series progressed

Sciurus_vulgaris521d ago

I found Battlefield 1 to be overrated. The gameplay was simpler and less strategic than its predecessors. Battlefield 1 did have a woo-factor, but the gameplay got repetitive faster than Battlefield 4 in my opinion.

porkChop521d ago

If DICE needs to return to the roots of the franchise then why would they look at Battlefield 1? BF1 is overly simplified and streamlined. What DICE should focus on is Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2. Those two games were the pinnacle of the franchise.

TheEnigma313521d ago

BC2 was the best. they need to get back to that.

Show all comments (7)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot752d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250751d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface750d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop751d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno751d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel752d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps751d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888751d ago (Edited 751d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33751d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888751d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH751d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)