840°

No Man’s Sky Under Investigation from UK Advertising Standards

The UK Advertising Standards Authority confirmed to Eurogamer that it is currently investigating No Man’s Sky after receiving complaints about the game’s advertising.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
SpringHeeledJack2766d ago

Good. It was false advertising and then had the cheek to charge £46 for it. Where are all its defenders now, shameful those who attacked people who called out this trash game. Intact trash game is ok, it was the lies and false advertising.

SonyWarrior2766d ago

this is music to my ears i was waiting for the lawsuits to come in

phantomexe2766d ago

I could still defend it, are the results back from the investigation??? No there not. Hello games can't be responsible for your inability to research your games. O look nice overload posting his video again. That's a whole lot of BS way to not be objective but it wasn't on your xbox tho.

freshslicepizza2766d ago

Knew it was coming, now they will work tirelessly to get some of the missing features

Paytaa2766d ago

@phantomexe I wouldn't want it on Xbox anyway. Saves people the money.

XanderZane2766d ago

That's a great video. All that hype for a completely unfinished crappy game. From 9:00 on it's pretty funny. Especially when the game keeps freezing for everyone. "Whaaaaat!?!? My game just froze again." lmao!! At least that didn't have in QB or Killzone.

Overload2766d ago

Crowbcat is the best channel on YouTube.

spicelicka2766d ago

Omg this video is well made

_-EDMIX-_2765d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

@Phan- "I could still defend it"

Nope. I own the game day 1 and can't defend lies bud. Its extremely clear and well documented that they lied regarding the final product. Not saying anything about the lies, is a lie. Omitting information is a LIE! Sooooo unless you have a link to the team or Sony saying those features will not be in the final game, its a lie.

Why defend something that is for a fact a lie? Sooooo defending scamming? Ummm I guess if you love scammers.

Look bud, I own the game, my PSN ID is EDMIX, I owned it day 1.....anyone who knows me on PSN, knows I played it day 1 and own the title.

This isn't a "xbox fanboy" thing buddy, its they lied and need to pay for that. Sorry but no one has yet to produce any documentation regarding this information being provided to users before the games release, stating those features would not be in the game.

Zero.

Not from the teams twitter, not from their site, not even from Sony.

Have a link?

They had zero transparency regarding those features, that is called lying. You are leaving out that what was seen before, will not be in the final game, yet you are happy to take peoples money. That is called a scam, fraud etc.

2765d ago
NXSwitch2765d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

Just watched the video & the BS that is coming out his mouth is unbelievable! The game is a shame to the industry & it needs to forgotten it its own space universe never to be remembered! At 11:08 had me dying at the video!...Best song ever ''you can do anything''!

Deadpooled2765d ago

@SpringHeeledJack

£46? You can get games in the UK day 1 launch for sub-£40 easily if you look around online on sites like shopto, simplygames, thegamecollection, tesco direct (some great deals with codes like the recent 2 for £70 preorder deal) etc, even Amazon UK recently cut the price of preorders down to £37 briefly before putting the price back up again.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
Timesplitter142766d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

Don't you guys think the hate is starting to get a little too extreme for what they deserve?

I mean, even though he did clumsily say you might be able to see other players online in interviews, most well-informed people still knew there was no real multiplayer in NMS, as it was explicitly written on the official site as well as in several articles.

Do you guys really take this so seriously that you wish these people would lose their jobs and go to prison or something? This seems unfathomably childish to me. "Gamer" culture always manages to prove that it can reach new lows when I thought it was already at rock-bottom.

No amount of disappointment in a game / buyer's remorse is worth destroying people's lives. Not for $60

DaDrunkenJester2766d ago

It wasn't just the MP my dear boy...

Timesplitter142766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

@DaDrunkenJester
Sure, I'll take your word for it, but don't these things happen literally all the time?

Who, in 2016, isn't abundantly aware that any planned feature of any ambitious software project could be ditched at any time? And it's not because of any ill intent or anything; it's just natural. Nobody can predict the future perfectly.

81BX2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

@ timesplitter
They do happen a lot. I think the difference is if you let that narrative continue without correcting it publicly before release. If i say the game will have a feature tlduring an interview, its to promote a game in a good light to the public. So if im wrong its only right to let them know the game isnt going to have that feature. Wasnt halo 5 said to have split screen then later on in the dev cycle it came out that it wasnt going to happen?

kraenk122766d ago

It's getting ridiculous. Internet hate trains are the worst.

xDealtwithIt2766d ago

The fact that there's no mp, nothing to do as you said not to mention a list more that wasn't in the game does warrant the hate. Especially for people like me who spent 60 dollars on this crap, so yes I rather see these guys pay some type of debt back instead of vacationing in Barbados on our dime.

NohansenBoy2766d ago

I'm only for the gamer. A conman is a conman and no we shouldn't accept this anymore. Just, because scummy behavior is the norm doesn't mean we have to accept it.

rainslacker2766d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

That's not what they're investigating though. They're investigating if the screenshots and videos used on Steam accurately portray what was delivered in the game. Namely animal behavior and large scale battles.

Will at least be an interesting case to define the use of bull shots for marketing purposes....a fairly common industry practice.

@imalwaysright below

I agree. My biggest problem with all this isn't that people have concerns. Not that I feel that some people are being overly particular with said concerns. Not that I feel people are being way too reactionary and over-zelous with their critique(although that I do take some issue with).

It's that people are so damn inconsistent in their criticisms and holding this game to a standard which they don't hold to many other games out there. These same people so upset now will just as easily dismiss a concern for a game they actually like. They will make the same excuses that those of us supporting the game now make to defend it. But they won't ever take one second to consider just how common such practices are in the industry, that most of the people complaining now have indeed had similar complaints in the past, and they dont consider that their current zeal is much more than their zeal for the bigger issue at hand than they show in other such instances.

NMS just feels like a perfect storm, and I've never once seen lists being collected of all the "lies" that surrounded a games marketing. It's always been general disdain for the practices being critiqued here, with some articles pointing it out, and people complaining about it for maybe a week before moving on.

NMS is being made an example of...which is fine...but the denial that people have for their own inconsistent actions is disheartening, because I know they won't hold it against other games, or even correlate how they were so upset over this game when it is eventually pointed out to them.

@Ghost(keeping it short sadly)

Maybe, but I will actually discuss the valid criticisms with people who are reasonable about it. Some of the stuff people have pointed out as lies is BS...so there is that.

For the most part though, the reaction to this game has been way out of proportion to the normal reactions of other instances like this happening, which is why I've become so defensive of it....because I don't find these reactions productive.

Have to forgive me on destiny, I don't follow that game at all.

"Again already proven wrong[snip]"

In that case, I wasn't referring to you. Would encourage you to continue doing so, so long as it's productive and not exaggerated hyperbolic reactionary nonsense.

This is a case where I have to speak generally often, so my comments won't mean I actually mean every single person.

Imalwaysright2766d ago

No. This needs to become a standard in this industry. Devs/publishers can't keep lying to us in order to get our money and get away with it. This is good for us, the consumer.

Mrveryodd2766d ago Show
pcz2766d ago

false advertising IS crime. its essentially fraud. consumers need to be protected.

to defend a company who is willing to lie to you and everyone else in order to get you to part with your money is frankly idiotic and defeats all logic and reason.

Gh05t2765d ago

@rainslacker

"These same people so upset now will just as easily dismiss a concern for a game they actually like. "

Isnt that what the people defending this game are doing? Dismissing the things that they dont feel were important, because they like the game presented. So yeah it happens but its funny how you only pointed out the people hating as being the ones who will flip flop. What if I told you all the people dismissing all the BS here will be the ones hating the next game they dont like for the same reasons. See how that works. Net neutral meaning its pointless to bring up.

"...and I've never once seen lists being collected of all the "lies" that surrounded a games marketing. " Destiny says hello, and I was a basher of that game too because I bought the damn $90 game and it was terrible and half what was advertised. I mean go look back in 2014 and look at the reddit posts with them putting the McDuck swimming through gold vault gifs, with bullet point things that were advertised and not in game. Just because this seems larger scale doesnt mean the same things didnt occure.

"...but the denial that people have for their own inconsistent actions is disheartening, because I know they won't hold it against other games..." Again already proven wrong because I bashed the crap out of Bungie and still haven't touched Destiny and so by bashing NMS I am actually BEING consistent.

_-EDMIX-_2765d ago

Nope.

I own the game and can tell you they deserve all the hate they are getting. I mean...maybe not lie to people? What can I say...

_-EDMIX-_2765d ago

My issue with those who are even defending this....

Soooooo its perfectly ok to scam people? What you define as a scam is what this team did. They have videos and demos of things in the game that don't exist in the final game.

They don't tell you this.

That is fraud, scam and is a crime. What are folks really trying to fight? I own the damn game....doesn't mean I suddenly don't know the law.

Many can disagree with me, I fine with that, you can call me many things, you can't question my integrity folks. Even from a game I've defended BEFORE release, but I also defended what I believed the team was going to deliver, not a lie.

Me liking the game is irrelevant and many need to detach their personal love for the game to come to a real conclusion about what this team has done. If we merely say "if blank developer does" you seriously telling me you being scammed is perfectly fine?

In what way does this help anyone that this team did this other then Hello Games?

thorstein2765d ago Show
2765d ago
s45gr322765d ago

In the US any form of advertisement cannot lie in regards to its product. For example a car that advertises it features smartphone locking door mechanism. The car must have it, same as what people eat from the menu. False advertisement in the videogame industry needs to stop. Is a US crime and apparently in the UK is illegal as well.

blackblades2765d ago

Yep, still remember someone tried to sue Starbuck because the ice in a ice coffee or something like that. It was so stupid just like this, freaking deal with it and move on.

2765d ago
cyber_daemonx2765d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

Exactly. Entitled whiners pi55ed cos it wasn't on their crappy console. How many other games are guilty of exactly the same practices hello games are getting pilloried for, Ubisoft being especially culpable.

Its a fuck1ng travesty.

+ Show (20) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
NXSwitch2766d ago Show
sampson31212766d ago ShowReplies(1)
2765d ago
sho0ok2765d ago

What's interesting to me is that Sony and Steam knew the game was falsely advertised. That's is why they offered a refund for everyone to avoid a lawsuit.

However, Hello Games are still in trouble.

Nineball21122765d ago

Look, the evidence is very clear that Sean Murray lied through his teeth, for whatever reason. Pressure from others, pressure he put on himself, etc.

HOWEVER, that does NOT excuse him. I don't wish him ill, but I hope he learns from this debacle, and NEVER does something like this again. Have I played the game? Nope. Do I want to at this point? Nope. Did I want to at one point. Yep.

I think we all make mistakes, but damn... this was a doozy. If you lose people's trust, it's extremely difficult to get it back.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
Gazondaily2766d ago ShowReplies(5)
1nsomniac2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

Haha I think I posted the exact ASA guideline that could be used to sue Hello Games if anyone wanted to try. After all the idiots on here fought tooth & nail that the game was exactly as advertised & that all the "whiners" should just accept it & shut up.

Guess it took off. Fair play to them. Hello Games should not be allowed to get away with it & other developers should take notice!

rainslacker2766d ago

As of right now, it's an investigation. Regulatory boards investigate complaints. Doesn't mean that they'll find issue when they conclude their investigation. Maybe wait until a conclusion is reached before declaring victory and calling others idiots?

1nsomniac2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

The advertised features are either in the game or not. Even for the "idiots" it's pretty black & white at this point. To argue with that would make them quite clearly an idiot. That shouldn't need to be questioned either.

rainslacker2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

Really? Lets look at the invetigation and what it's actually investigating.

1.Shown animal behavior which isn't present in game.

So, they show some animal behavior in the trailers. It's more complex than what's in the game. But was that animal behavior shown as a bullshot, or as a feature indicative of what would actually be in the game? It shows animal behavior in general, which does exist in the game.

2. Large scale space battles.

Well, space battles exist in the game. The size terminology is a fairly subjective term. Sure, there's an expectation of what that means, but that expectation is on the consumers part, not on the advertisers part. It's marketing hyperbole, and is used in a large number of marketing campaigns.

Other complaints

-Ship flying behavior(OMG, like more exciting representations are never used for advertising)
-structures and building as pictured (I dunno, do they exist? Lots of things shown in the trailers may never be seen because of the vastness and procedural generation)
-Loading times(well, technically, there are none, or they're masked. Maybe we should sue ND too for having -loading times masked by cut scenes. Truly, skip a cut scene in UC, and you get a loading screen.)
-Aiming system(Not sure what this is, but I can certainly aim in my copy)
-Behavior of ships and sentinals(Not sure how one can derive behavior from screenshots)
-Quality of graphics(again, bullshots, lets investigate half the games that get released)
-UI changes (OMG, they changed the UI from a previous build and didn't update their marketing material. String them up and flay them, then burn them, then piss on their ashes).

About the only things that may have traction are trade convoys or vying factions and their impact on the experience.

If I saw all these people act this way for every instance of misleading marketing in the game industry, I'd be more prone to accepting people's ire right now. As it stands though, people let this stuff slide more often than not....but now, it's gotten to the point where Murray is being cast out by gamers for being a bit too over-zealous in selling his game.

2765d ago
UltraNova2765d ago

I wonder what they'd do to Peter Molyneu or whatevr is his name these days...

That said I hope the industry learns their lesson from this fiasco that has become of No Mans Sky..

EnigmaSG12765d ago

This is some insight by someone well in the know on how the ASA works. In short, it will amount to nothing of substantial prominence.

http://www.merseyremakes.co...

2765d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
Phunkydiabetic12765d ago

Ugh. This is just reaching such neck bearded pathetic levels of lameness here.

Phunkydiabetic12765d ago

This whole thing is just so pathetic man. No wonder "gamers" are still regarded as the most pathetic group of hobbyists out there.

pumpactionpimp2765d ago

Yeah, what a pathetic group of losers all gamers must be for wanting what was promised over and over again. It's so pathetic to not want a company to lie to you about their product. We should just shut up and hand them money, and be happy with whatever they decide to give us.

Seriously, we're you born this stupid?

Phunkydiabetic12764d ago

Keep adding to the neckbearded mythos there "pumpactionpump" (pfff hahahahaha "pimp").

Artemidorus2766d ago

Good, the idiot deserves his studio to go bust and himself in the dole que.

He never deserves a chance to be in charge of making a game ever again.

Liar of 2016.

kraenk122766d ago

I get it...you didn't even buy the game.

Gazondaily2766d ago

Ah so people have to buy shit games to critique bad practice and clear misrepresentation. Gotcha 👍

kraenk122766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

Yeah, so they should at least know what they're talking about....which is of course unrealistic...this is N4G nonetheless.

Artemidorus2766d ago

You can join him in that queue for defending such stupidity.

Liqu1d2766d ago

So much for reserving judgement until you've played it Septic. Keep up the good fight.

kraenk122766d ago

You know his moves...we all do.

SpinalRemains1382766d ago

Thanks to those who told the truth, he saved his money.

How is that a bad thing? The creator flagrantly lied, a lot.

NoPeace_Walker2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

@Kraenk12
Why do you need to buy a game and in the process of wasting $60 when that is what reviews and W.O.M are for? It is to inform us and to give us an overall idea of how the product is so it can at least stop some from being total sheeps and buy whatever game companies put out there.

Look no further than the reviews from Steam owners that actually have the games.

http://store.steampowered.c...
User reviews:
RECENT:
Overwhelmingly Negative - 11% of the 13,149 user reviews in the last 30 days are positive.

OVERALL:
Mostly Negative - 34% of the 69,271 user reviews for this game are positive.

Many of the Steam and PS4 NMS owners were suckered into the marketing hyped and promises and bought it in advanced and many I'm sure wish they could've had waited a bit longer for reviews before buying. There is a reason why the game dropped like a rock on players count and people demanding refunds.

Unless you actually works for Hello Games or Sean Murray himself, it is rediculous some of you go to defend this type of game making and advertising.

Majister-Ludi2765d ago

Gtfo I didn't buy I torrented and thank God I did because it was just grinding trash. If I didn't ever play it there is more than enough info to back up the game is shit so try again.

Gh05t2765d ago

Right because anyone who has anything negative to say about this "Didnt buy the game."

Thats akin to just name calling, why not just call him a poopoo head and get it over with.

Gazondaily2765d ago

@liquid and kraenk

Yeah keep on defending bullshit. One day you might actually raise your standards...

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
rainslacker2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

So a guy screws up some marketing, and he never deserves to be given a chance to make another game?

You think this investigation will cause his company to go bust? At most, he'll get a fine, that the consumers will never see a dime of. Total win right? Hooray for you. You can be all righteous that someone officially agrees with you. In the meantime, the hate machine continues on. Damn him for being over-excited about his product, having terrible PR skills, and not being able to deliver though.....am I right?

If he can get funding, and has the money to make another game, then he has every right to make another one. Hopefully when that time comes, people will keep their hype in check, Sean will be a little more reserved in his marketing, or at least hire proper PR people, and people like you can just ignore the game since you feel he is such a deviant to the industry and apparently society, that has committed such a grievous crime that his entire career, and the career of all the companies employees should be ruined because you didn't get a few features.

Artemidorus2766d ago

Stop supporting lies and corrupt nonsense.

You are the very reason why cancerous gaming exisits. Nothing will improve until you see the error of your ways.

rainslacker2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

I'm not supporting it. I'm also not supporting rampant hate and exaggerated hyperbole that denies people's double standards for common industry practices. I'm not even saying people shouldn't express their concerns.

Sorry if you don't approve, but his mistakes on this game do not warrant him being cast aside and never being allowed to make a game again.

people make mistakes. You and a movement against the man should not determine his future with such absolutes.

If I'm the problem, then so be it. I will stand up for developers being given the chance to correct mistakes, learn from them, and move on to hopefully make something special. If what he may make in the future is appealing to me, I will support it, regardless of what happened with NMS, or people's feelings about it.

The problem for you is that I can think independently, and you don't like that, because you can not accept that not everyone is so hellbent on ruining the man, or the product, and that some people were perfectly content with what they got, because it was what they actually expected.

So, in short, the problem isn't me, it's not the industry, it's that you can't get what you want just by declaring it's what you want, so you throw these tantrums like it will somehow make a difference.

"Nothing will improve until you see the error of your ways"

Yeah, so the millions of times I say that people should hold all developers to the same standards, and hopefully they'll have these huge hate campaigns in the future for the numerous other games that fail to deliver doesn't apply to you?

You say I'm a problem because I don't hold devs accountable? I say the problem is that many people aren't consistent in their criticisms....hence, practices that are being decried here, will continue, because they've been going on since last gen.

Deny it, blame me, whatever. It doesn't matter. It's the plain truth of the matter.

If cancerous gaming is supporting games and having valid reasons to do so, then so be it.

How you can't consider cancerous gaming month long hate campaigns and exagerrated hyperbole to completely ruin a man/companies reason for existence just so you can feel good about yourself is beyond me.

I'm still waiting for the next game you praise, so I can show you how the dev lied to you.

I will always err on the side of caution, and always defend people's or devs rights to do what they can do. What I won't do is spend months having knee jerk reactions because I simply can't accept the fact that I may be wrong about something. You at no point would ever consider any counter argument, showing you won't even keep an open mind. You've never discussed this case with any kind of reasonable discussion that didn't devolve into vitriol. But I'm the problem? I'm the one making mistakes?

What a joke you are that you can't even come up with actual valid reasons why he should not be allowed to make another game other than he made some mistakes on this one. It's not like what he did was criminal, it just didn't suit you or your expectations. In other words, get over yourself. Heck, MS made mistakes and lied while announcing the X1. Sony made mistakes with the announcement of the PS3. I guess they shouldn't be allowed to release consoles or games anymore....right?

Artemidorus2766d ago

As I said you support lies and corrupt behaviour.

It won't get improved until people like you stop defending it.

Mr Lahey2766d ago

Rainslacker, you seem like a good guy! It's refreshing here on N4G. Wish i could give you bubbles.. ;)

rainslacker2766d ago (Edited 2766d ago )

and as I said, I don't support it. I'm not calling out the dev, I'm calling you out for your witch hunting irrational declaration that the man has no right to make another game. I'm calling you out for being reactionary and inconsistent with your criticisms. I'm calling you out for being too obstinate in your opinion and not trying to see any other point of view. I'm calling you out for your vitriolic and childish attitudes towards this matter since day one.

I only defend because people have elevated this to near epic proportions of an example of malicious lies and unjust consumer practices, when in fact, it's nothing more than another example of the things we complain about often on here, and more often than not give a free pass to and forget about after a week. I have in fact had rational discussions on the critique with those who choose to not act the way you do, and in those cases, I have indeed held the dev accountable, and indeed spent time discussing the matter and the overall issues at hand as it pertains to the industry. But I can't do that with someone like you, because doing so, you refuse to see anything contrary which tries to put it into perspective, and instead only see what agrees with you. Nothing else is a consideration.

I believe all devs should be held accountable. I often hold them accountable for their actions across the board. Never, do i declare that they should never be allowed to make games. My critiques are about trying to make things better. Your critiques are to try and ruin a company and a man. There's a difference, and I will reiterate that of the two different methods we employ, mine is not the problem.

BigLurch2766d ago

Thanks to blind defenders like you,we can always expect shady practices in our industry moving forward.
I bet dodgy devs like Sean at Hello games wishes more consumers were just like you,soooo easy to pull the wool over and still have you pitch in on the marketing of the game for free.

rainslacker2766d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

@Lurch

You don't know me, or what I stand for, despite the fact I spelled it out in a later reply to this comment.

There is no wool. I see what people are upset about. I understand why some are upset. I agree with some of the things people are upset about.

But, the problem I have is the inconsistent nature of people's hate over this, while giving other games free passes, and more so, the absolute ridiculous levels this particular matter has escalated to. in other words, I'm tired of the same things you're accusing me of doing.

My problems with the industry are many of which the same people around here are decrying, and I would love to stand behind those with reasonable concerns. But I can't, because many are going to far with their vitriol, and the whole matter has been obfuscated with manufactured ways that the developer "lied". There is plenty of valid criticisms of this case worth discussing and relating it to the overall industry and bad practices, but how is arts comment about how a dev should be ostracized due to his mistakes in any way related to the matter at hand?

I will hold developers accountable for poor decisions, misleading marketing, botched releases, and broken games. So it'd be nice if people would actually stop accusing me of being some sort of apologist for the industry and devs because of this.

I was calling out Art. It wasn't a defense of the developer, it wasn't trying to say the dev did no wrong. I was saying that he is being unreasonable and childish with his comments, and like you, can't come up with a single counter argument that doesn't involve making it about me, because he can't discuss the issue with reasonable discourse which could lead to productive changes in the industry.

So, yes, blind defenders are a problem....but what's more a problem is the double standards that people have towards the industry. that's what's happening here. You want to bitch, start complaining that art doesn't go around complaining the same for any number of other games which mislead....like I did, and then explain to him why he's a problem.

Just look at the number of disagrees to anyone who is trying to be reasonable in the discussion on these threads. They are numerous....but the only counter argument that anyone can ever come up with is, "You are the problem with the industry", and completely ignoring their own childish and reactionary behavior as if it's completely normal and acceptable, all while making declarations like people should never be allowed to work again.

Why am I the problem? Because I don't allow people to go unnoticed when they run constant hate about an issue with no reasonable discourse? I beg someone to tell me how Arts OP is reasonable. At no time, has anyone done that. But damn, people sure are making their point saying I'm the problem, and hitting that disagree button really should change my opinion on the matter.

Let's put arts OP into perspective to show how it's relevant to the industry and how he's being irrational calling for proverbial blood.

Fans of fable I'm sure wouldn't want it so Lionhead couldn't make F2/3 because of Molyneux and his over promises.

We wouldn't be getting Horizon:ZD if Guerrilla was taken down because that one guy sued Sony over the MP marketing.

It seems people are pretty damn excited for Mass Effect:A despite one's choices not really mattering one bit for the original trilogy.

So....how am I wrong to call him out, and how am I blind for doing so? I actually agree with you to a point...that people should decry bad practices. I just prefer they do it properly.

pcz2766d ago

you are the reason why its normal for games to be released practically broken and unfinished.

i cant think of any other industry where its acceptable to give consumers faulty goods. its because of gamers like you that we continue to be taken for a joke.

its not acceptable to peddle hot garbage to consumers duped by a deceitful advertising campaign.

Gazondaily2765d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

You are supporting it. Your father weak list above trying to downplay the misrepresentation by the devs is what then?

NotEvenMyFinalForm2765d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

this marketing went on for years bro. Even by the same week the game was releasing they were showing fake trailers that included sand planets and giant sand worms that looked like those things from the Tremors movie. ;/

Can you even mention a game dev that has lied to us like this before?

Adrian_v012765d ago (Edited 2765d ago )

@rainslacker

The thing is, you'rr not being reasonable, you're still defending the game, but just wording it differently so it's not that apparent. The list above you made is proof of that (you don't seem much different from other i-got-what-i-expected types).

To get your most obvious mistake out of the way, the developer is indeed a criminal. Having in mind the sum of money involved, this was a huge scam which is in fact illegal.

Second, you attack everyone who bashes the game, saying they are hypocrites. You get angry when they say that people like you are a problem in the industry, but actually they have a point. According to your logic people should never start complaining because they never complained before. See, that's illogical right there. There has to be one event that will be the base for new habits, no man's sky is that event.

Lastly, you criticize people for being the exact same person you are. You say they complain about NMS, but they give other games a free pass. That is exactly what you are doing, I'm sure you've complained about games before, but here you are giving NMS a free pass (you can state that you complain too, but this is evident by your list above). Now, I see no problem with such a behavior, the collective of gamers will never just hate or just love a game, that's irrational to expect. Some will love it, others wont. It's just logical that people won't complain about games they like (why are you even expecting something different?)

The thing with NMS is that the difference in numbers between those who like it and those who hate it is huge. If the majority feel scammed they have a right to demand an investigation. If you want to keep defending it come up with arguments that wont make you look like a hypocrite and irrational yourself.

darx2765d ago

Damn Rainslacker you love Sean Murray!

2765d ago
cyber_daemonx2765d ago

@rain, its pointless. You may as well bang your head against a wall. Logic and reason won't work against illogical and unreasonable hatred. Kudos for trying though.

All the so called aaa's that have done worse practices and got a free pass.

Its a videogame at the end of the day, you'd think Sean Murray had commited genocide judging by some of the comments.

Ridiculous.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
XanderZane2766d ago

In every one of those interview videos Sean is smiling and laughing. I wonder if he's laughing now. "One Man's Lie" flops and now he's getting sued.

kraenk122766d ago Show
Rebel_Scum2765d ago

"Good, the idiot deserves his studio to go bust and himself in the dole que.

He never deserves a chance to be in charge of making a game ever again."

Your post is automatically made redundant to the reader when you post with such immaturity. The fact that you wish that shows you should examine your own character.

Artemidorus2765d ago Show
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2765d ago
Show all comments (186)
300°

Microsoft Seemingly Closes Bethesda France

As part of its plans to cut 1,900 jobs, Microsoft has reportedly shut down operations at Bethesda France, letting go roughly 15 people

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
Hereandthere22h ago

Microsoft should have left them stay 3rd party

GamerRN20h ago

If they are let go, they can be whatever they want. They ARE 3rd party now... 🤦

Barlos17h ago

Yeah, they're also jobless.

GamerRN10h ago

They can form a company if they want, they are just as jobless as if "Microsoft had left them as 3rd party".

peppeaccardo12h ago

"MIcrosoft leaves Bethesda do what they know how to do best" ... close! Oh the irony ....
(Citation from a week old article)

ChasterMies8h ago

I think Microsoft and other game publishers are letting people go because they think ai will replace them. Doesn’t matter how much profit they make. They were always going to be let go.

PassNextquestion22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

Bethesda France was made up of roughly 15 people... they couldn't of being doing much

Bethesda France mainly did publishing and marketing within the region

blacktiger20h ago

that's a shame for you to say that, i'm sure Elite loves hearing what you just said.

Mr Logic6h ago

What a stupid thing to say. The elites give 0 fucks what we say on an obscure website in the comments section.

Crows905h ago

You can always reach out and give them jobs at your company man. Don't wait

Profchaos22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

Bethesda France focused on publishing and marketing in the region. And 15 people lost their jobs as part of the closure.

I wonder if this is part of Microsoft's strategy to abandoned physical media or possibly gamepass advertising makes their roles redundant you don't need to market a game as hard when the majority of players get the game as part of a sub which already promoted upcoming games

Tacoboto22h ago

It's France too, there's a high likelihood only 1-2 people on the team even had an Xbox.

Profchaos21h ago

Possibly guven all the leaks we know the Xbox brand is really struggling in the region.

Yi-Long18h ago

Well, if your consoles and games are barely found in any stores any more, of course you're gonna struggle finding consumers ...

XiNatsuDragnel21h ago

Tbh Microsoft I think Bethesda being 3rd party same with Activision would probably more competitive than thus scenario imo

Profchaos19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

I think it would have been better for all parties really especially gamers

TheColbertinator20h ago

The recently purchased Activision French offices might take over all the licensing and marketing for Microsoft in France from now on.

Show all comments (21)
80°

I’m Glad Atlus & SE Changed Dates To Avoid Competing With Shadow Of The Erdtree

Saad from eXputer: "I'm glad I don't have to choose between Square Enix, Atlus, and FromSoftware due to bad release windows and Shadow of the Erdtree."

H91d 16h ago

More intelligent than guerilla games

raWfodog22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

Atlus is releasing their game one week before Erdtree, SE is releasing theirs one week after.

HZD released four days before Zelda, HFW released one week before Elden Ring.

It seems to me like they are still releasing their games too close to Erdtree.

130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg23h ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos23h ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola18h ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)