1070°

eSports Players Share Suspiciously Similar Tweets After Playing CoD: Infinite Warfare Multiplayer

Check out these tweets from the eSports players who got early access to Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare multiplayer. They are suspiciously similar.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
CoNn3r_B2910d ago

I thought the writer was being pedantic for a second but they're not.

SolidStoner2909d ago

Cod always do this.. no surprise there.. many celebrities before did the same, saying it was best cod ever released, with competitive MP and all that BS... I notice that this "trend" of lying is like OK in USA culture.. everyone does that, even politicians, look at those debates where everyone is lying about his prefered candidate... lmao.. gaming is even less controlled!

DivoJones2909d ago

Could be something like a twitter integration within the beta, and a pre-populated message they just click and send. Or they simply offered to give these people a free copy of the game in exchange for being part of their hype machine.

IceKoldKilla2909d ago

You don't just get a free copy for that. You get paid.

ILostMyMind2910d ago

Go, people and buy everything they want you buy. kkkkkkkkk

psplova2910d ago

This game brainwashed all these people! No buy.

tablecloth2909d ago

I got to play Infinite Warfare MP last week, wish I could say more but I can say I loved the way it felt

2910d ago Replies(1)
esmittystud1012909d ago

Even throwing in a very reasonable $20 copy for CoD4 Remaster.........I still am not biting on there futuristic settings. When your aircraft looks like something out of Halo.........I'm just not interested. Go back in time........not WWIV

CoNn3r_B2909d ago

CoD is turning into Halo and Halo is turning into CoD. It seems that innovation is a slang term shameless copying.

Erik73572909d ago

The art direction isn't even close to the quality of Halo.....and last time I checked halo 5 was a huge throwback to old halo multiplayer.

Errorist762909d ago

@Fries

The art direction in Halo5 was the worst in the series. Bungie was much better!

lastking952909d ago

Htf did halo copy cod? Fps seem to be going toward a faster pace futuristic style since Titanfall released

Paytaa2909d ago (Edited 2909d ago )

I'm sorry but as a Halo player since 2001 and a former CoD player from like 2005-2011, neither game is like one another. One of the main differences is in the TTK for weapons in each game. Halo 5 plays a lot like Halo 2 with a lot of it's own thing thrown in. CoD has short kill times since it's a twitch shooter that plays nothing like Halo. For example a weapon like the BR in Halo is a 4-shot kill (3 body shots, 1 head shot) or can be more if you have trouble aiming. No weapon in Call of Duty fuctions like that. Literally the only thing in each game that show resemblance is the ability to sprint and both have a dash feature that play completely differently within their respective gameplay. Also, if you're playing Arena, everyone spawns with the same thing and has weapon pickups and power-ups, something CoD has never had in it's games.

If Halo 5 played anything remotely to Call of Duty, I wouldn't still be playing it almost everyday 7 months after launch. To say it is means you clearly bought into blanket Internet criticisms without putting some time into the game.

Anyway, Halo has always been a futuristic sci-fi shooter, CoD hasn't and that's the problem. It's digging into territory to give an excuse for pointless new features that wouldn't work in an older setting ultimately tarnishing the core gameplay.

slate912909d ago

Lol, try again. Your agrees show the bias on here.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2909d ago
aquaticDonut2909d ago

Then feel free to play the original CoDs. The future setting seems to be the only way they can inject some very, VERY much needed change into the franchise.

Show all comments (74)
70°

Call of Duty VR Games - Will They Ever Happen?

The VR industry has long awaited sign of true Call of Duty VR games, but will it ever happen? And does it need to happen?

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
crazyCoconuts305d ago

I don't think it's in Activision's DNA to stick their neck out on something like this unfortunately. They've got a surefire winner with COD so why risk a winning formula.
fwiw, Firewall Zero Hour was more fun than COD for me, but obviously didn't have the same user base and budget
I wonder hypothetically if a non-VR COD style game were to integrate VR players, could you even balance such a thing out. I'm guessing no.

TheEnigma313304d ago

No it won't. They are lazy and people will buy anyways

ApocalypseShadow304d ago

Highly unlikely at the moment. Executives are more concerned with being bought by Daddy Warbucks and golden parachutes than moving VR forward. They had a chance last gen but released a spaceship, combat demo instead. COD would increase VR awareness but if they were bought, the same thing that happened to other developers under Microsoft would happen to them.

Just consider, before being bought by Microsoft, Bethesda had Skyrim and Wolfenstein Cyber pilot. Ninja Theory had Hell Blade, Dexed and helped with Vader Immortal. Inxile had Mage's Tale. Double Fine had Psychonauts. ID Software had Doom VFR and Doom 3. Compulsion had We Happy Few: Uncle Jack Live.

Ever since the purchase of those developers, zero VR games announced or released. And since Microsoft continues to shun VR, Activision games like COD wouldn't have VR either under them.

Firewall, Crossfire, Pavlov, and whoever else makes an FPS game in VR, will have to do for the time being. Maybe Sony will make one like Killzone or Resistance in VR. Also surprised that Valve didn't put Counterstrike in VR.

poppatron304d ago

I think the experience would be so different to traditional CoD and share so little with it that there would be no point in pinning the CoD label on it. I think Pavlov is about as close as you’ll get

370°

Xbox Fans Call Out 'Activision's Greed' Over Call Of Duty Digital Prices

This week's Deals with Gold selection on Xbox has rubbed certain Xbox fans the wrong way, as several Call of Duty titles are still ludicrously priced - despite being discounted by up to 67% off over the next few days.

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
VersusDMC962d ago

How is 20 dollars for X360 call of duty games "ludicrously" overpriced?

And with Activision's lawer bills skyrocketing at the moment you are not going to be seeing deep discounts for a bit.

Chevalier962d ago

Pretty sure that's the sale off that's 60% off. After the sale ends that 360 game is still listed at $49.99, right not its $19.99 because the 60% off.

VersusDMC962d ago

I guess they can wait for the next sale then.

SullysCigar962d ago

It's nice to see the Xbox community stand up for themselves though. That's been needed for a long time.

InUrFoxHole961d ago

For a long time? Its the reason xbox is killing it this gen.

senorfartcushion962d ago

Lawsuits don’t cost billions, they’re ALWAYS going to be fine for money.

They could stack their bills on the ground and fill half the continent of Africa at this point.

RaiderNation962d ago

Because Xbox fans are so used to playing games on the Xbox EBT subscription service, the idea of paying anything for a game seems ludicrous to them.

MadLad961d ago (Edited 961d ago )

You pay for the service.

Do you have Amazon Video?
Hulu?
Netflix?

It's a subscription service. Not a charity. You're literally going at people over the idea of using a pro consumer service, and that's the real joke here.

thorstein961d ago

When records were sold, they were eventually replaced by tapes, which cost less to manufacture, but more to buy. Then CDs came along and were cheaper to manufacture, but cost more at retail. Digital, of course, is the cheapest yet, but billion dollar corporations want to charge the same.

And no, that money is not going to the person sitting in the chair actually making the game.

It is pure and utter greed from people who don't need any more money.

InUrFoxHole961d ago

Lol calm down Bobby. You crapped on thus franchise.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 961d ago
autobotdan962d ago (Edited 962d ago )

"Many have also noted how the multiplayer in several of these titles is either dead or filled with hackers, meaning players are paying a hefty sum for a short campaign and potentially some zombie modes."

With these clear truths the decades older COD games should be permanently 19.99 regular price and sale prices 7.99 minimum

autobotdan962d ago

Typo sale prices 2.99 minimum and 9.99 maximum. Older COD tiles seven years old or older should never be over 20 dollars regular price

senorfartcushion962d ago

I have paid less than 3 dollars for some AAA PS4 games, old 360 CoD games should not be $20

FanboysKiller962d ago

Any fps game runs by the quirk engine follows this logic
Eat
Sleep
Die instantly
Repeat
As if the main purpose of the game more of "repeat" than the actual gameplay experience , any noob in this game will tell you his mind stucked in repeating the sequence number of deaths than the gameplay itself , what a complete pile of #.

EvertonFC962d ago

It's why I don't play cod anymore, my 45yr old hands can't compete with these kids 😂 🤣
1 kill to every 10 deaths is not fun

John_McClane962d ago

Don't let that stop you if you enjoy the game, it's actually pretty good for hand/eye coordination.

lipton101961d ago

Try Escape from Tarkov. It forces you to slow down and think. I’m not a fan of the ADD speed of CoD

Father__Merrin962d ago

All the back compat titles are cheap listing when you scroll through them u till you come to black ops it's a complete rip off

Rhythmattic962d ago (Edited 962d ago )

Well... Don't buy it..... Is it really that hard to comprehend?
Everything else you choose to purchase with your hard earned cash , so should games be held to the same reasoning....
Just don't give em the cash....

Entitlement that's bizarre, from the publisher and from the consumer.... Thats pretty fkd up if you think about it...

GhostofHorizon962d ago

It's hilarious that some people don't see this as an option.

MadLad961d ago

Bananas now cost $30 a pound. There's no good reason for it, but if you want bananas, there you go.

You don't have to buy them.

It's about their constant greed when handling the franchise. Nobody has to buy anything, but when a company doesn't follow corporate norms when selling their product; overpricing their old wares just because they can, the consumer is allowed to call that out.

GhostofHorizon961d ago

Consumer can call them out, but I think they are going about it the wrong way.

The reason they get away with everything they do is simply because they can. They can charge $20 for a skin pack because people will gladly buy it. There is plenty of competition for FPS games, it's not like it's a niche market.

I know it's easier to blame and demand better from Activision than people that keep buying these overpriced items. If they weren't being bought, Activision would lower the price though. People like to pretend to take the high road but wouldn't you rather sell the banana for $30 than $3 if people are willing to buy it?

franwex961d ago

@therealtedcruz

I think there’s a virus destroying the banana and may even go extinct. So maybe that’s why.

I think it’s happen before too.

MadLad961d ago

A small subset buys those skins and whatnot. Most players don't. The "whale" mindset is pretty accurate across the board, where there's a small handful who buy a lot, and most who don't buy any. Either way, that means they're imposed on the majority either way.

That's different from overpricing your game though. Activision easily makes their money off every release, then milks it until the next release, then throws it away. They never put significant sales on even a release from several cycles ago. Whether it sells or not.

And I mean, yeah; if I were a business, I'd probably want to make as much money as possible.
But I'm not a business; I'm a consumer, thus I find many businesses to be complete assholes.

Rhythmattic956d ago

And people are still blaming the high prices but suggest they're still wiling to buy it... Not too smart are you peoples....

Its a non regulated pricing structure, sure , many play by the status-quo , but to actually complain by complaining, instead of standing your ground and not buying it, by buying it , you are the reason its happening....

Idiots, Idiots everywhere.... What? So those that are complaining don't want to pay the money, but cant do without it?

FFS. Entitlement level 5000...
Drink some cement and harden the Fk up!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 956d ago
Sitdown962d ago

The article and title isn't saying that people are buying it, its simply saying that they are calling them out for greed. I guess you had a problem with people calling out Microsoft for trying to increase the price of Live, and don't understand how voicing concern led to them backing away from the decision.

Teflon02961d ago

People need to put that energy into Nintendo's Pricing over Activisions tbh. They're focused on the wrong things

Rhythmattic956d ago (Edited 956d ago )

Greed? Ok... Dont buy it and prove that by being greedy , they got it wrong... Not that hard to understand is it?
To Add... I haven't bought Cod since MW2.... Because of these exact practices.... Fact.

Show all comments (54)
60°

Ranking The Top 10 Call of Duty Games Of All-Time

Andrew says: "The intrinsic values of COD are the following: memorable campaigns, meticulous multiplayer marathons, and lobbies populated by screaming 12-year-old kids that think puberty is the evolved form of Jigglypuff."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com