540°
Submitted by alycakes 373d ago | interview

The Amazing Andrew Garfield: Tobey Maguire Interviews Andrew Garfield

VMAN:
A decade after Spider-Man the game changing blockbuster that broke all the records, Andrew Garfield stars in the summer's reboot, 'The Amazing Spider-Man'. Who better to give him advice than Tobey MaGuire, The original Spidey? Here, The two impassioned actors discuss the nature of success, storytelling, and celebrity. (Andrew Garfield, Cinema, The Amazing Spider-Man, Tobey Maguire)

Read full interview >>     Comments (13)
Comments (13)
alycakes  +   374d ago
I think this is so interesting and good that they could get together and talk over this common interest and work that they both have been a part of. I really enjoyed this.
#1 Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
newmonday  +   373d ago
while i'm exited for this re-boot, commercially wise it would have been better to wait at least 5 years, fan-attachment to the Rami movies could kill the hype, the Avengers and batman are also crowding the geek'O-sphere
#1.1 Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
Soldierone  +   373d ago
If i'm not mistaken, if they would have done that Disney would have stepped in and took the rights back. When Disney bought Marvel, Spider-man was the first they targeted. Sony either had to give up rights to the TV shows or the movies, and probably had a time frame to push out another movie.
#1.1.1 Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
sikbeta  +   373d ago
@new

SM3 killed all the "fan-attachment" the series had

I really hope this movie does better than the first SM at least, that way it'll have more confidence to keep going with it and don't screw up again
#1.1.2 (Edited 373d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report
Lord_Sloth  +   373d ago
You can taste the awkward. XXXD
#2 Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
MinimeJer05  +   373d ago
That was such an odd read, but awesome.
#3 Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
r21  +   373d ago
title should be spiderman interviews the amazing spiderman
#4 Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
xXBlondieVanHarlowXx  +   373d ago
That interview was awkward for everyone.

On a side-note. You can tell right off the bat that the Spidey reboot looks alot better than the original Spidey IMO. With Spidey's humor, his parents, his web shooters and Gwen all included it definitely feels alot closer to the comics.
#5 Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
WitWolfy  +   372d ago
Not really, Gwen was never a love interest really, more like a sister figure in the comics. They should of brought in a new Mary Jane IMO, they cant just erase her from the WHOLE universe acting like she never even existed, can they??? The only reason Gwen is there is because her dad is prob gonna die in the movie (just like in the comics) and end up living at the Parkers.

But who knows I could be wrong...
#5.1 (Edited 372d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
xXBlondieVanHarlowXx  +   372d ago
"They should of brought in a new Mary Jane IMO, they cant just erase her from the WHOLE universe acting like she never even existed, can they???"

Not sure if they plan to ignore MJ altogether i think they more or less want to establish a few characters first (Peter's parents, his aunt & uncle, Gwen, Gwen's father, Dr. Connors etc.) Spidey 3 was a mess because they threw in so much into so little time. Eddie Brock (random-ish bad guy), Gwen(New friend/love interest Peter has apparently known for a while), Sandman (Yet ANOTHER Bad guy linked to Peter's past o_o), the symbiote (random evil sticky goo that causes an insane urge to dance) (Awkward T-T). lol I honestly don't see MJ appearing until The Amazing Spider-man 3. Lets hope to god that they establish Norman Osbourne AND Eddie Brock as character's in Peter's life first and keep them human for at least 2 movies before making them super villains. Green Goblin and Venom are without a doubt some of Spider-man's best villains and i didn't feel they were done justice in Raimi's films. Now if the Green Goblin and Venom show up together in the same movie,,, that'll be a dream come true :D It'll happen, watch out for The Amazing Spider-man 3 :b Mark my words!!
#6 Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
HenderShot  +   368d ago
I feel like Emma Stone could've worked as a Mary Jane. I mean, she has red hair naturally right?
#6.1 Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
xXBlondieVanHarlowXx  +   367d ago
True Emma's a natural redhead. But then again Bryce Dallas Howard was a redhead & she played Gwen in Spider-man 3 while Kirsten Dunst who is a natural blonde played a Mary Jane lol. I always pictured Gwen to be the cute, intelligent and sweet girl in Peter's life. While i picture Mary Jane to be the slight opposite. In the end i think Emma Stone is better suited for the cute & sweet role while another actress will get the sexy redheaded go-getter role later in the series.

Odd enough i'm getting the feeling they'll get a natural blonde to play Mj lol. Come to think of it Emma Stone starred in a role opposite Bryce Dallas Howard before playing Gwen, soooooooo look for a blonde starring in a movie next to Kirsten Dunst & you got yourself your MJ lol.
#6.1.1 (Edited 367d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HenderShot  +   367d ago
Haha I never realized that. You may very well be right with the MJ prediction
#6.2 Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
Rules & guidelines
New stories
No stories found