Player Affinity writes: In my review of the first, umm, segment of Tom Six’s “Human Centipede” series, I stated that it was a very difficult film to review as it’s inherently meant to alienate and disgust – so how to judge it evenly? I had no such problem with The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) as not only does it retain (and amplify) the revoltingness of the original, but strips away any twisted charm, tension, good performances and frequent tongue-in-cheek execution that made “First Sequence” better than it had any right to be.
With the new The Crow remake coming soon, we take a look back at the 30-year-old cult classic original–and where the stars are now.
Kaam Chalu Hai Review: Based on true events, this movie is thought-provoking and inspiring
Rebel Moon Part 2 Review: This movie doesn't feel anything new or worth remembering, which is a shame.
This movie is too f$&@Ed up for me.
The Human Centipede wasn't exactly "new ground" in horror OR gore. In fact, it was very light on both. I was a bit underwhelmed by the first film. :/ There is no shock value in him sewing three people together. THAT'S THE TITLE! That's all he did? Seriously? Why should I care? I really didn't.
The Human Centipede II is meta, incredibly gory, original, and...at times...hilarious. It will sit proudly in my collection.
Why were people so disgusted by the first film?
Even Saw III and IV were MUCH more disgusting than The Human Centipede.