I don't know, I'm with the reviewer on this one. All the jokes were sex jokes and weren't very clever, like they were written by a 12 year old. I usually enjoy these kind of "stoner" movies but this was just awful. It's a shame because the idea is great but the execution is horrible.

Reviewer's opinions are just that, even critics are the same.

Some films that are well enjoyed by many people get around a 6 on IMDB, like the ones with Gene Wilder.. So tbh if you enjoy a particular film, just ignore the score it gets elsewhere. Reviews are also open to trolling, so you can't trust them fully either. Saying that, a 6 rating is considered average, whereas 7+ is considered good.

Reviewers can get their panties in a twist if there is something tiny they don't like in a film like particular types of humour, or something they got offended by, or a bit of blood. Basically.

You didn't watch the whole film. That renders your opinion utterly useless. Then you stooped to the low of creating a click bait blog post. Smh.

Nice. I was not aware you were being forced to read reviews here on Filmwatch, or anywhere else for that matter. The score is clearly posted there in the corner so you knew prior to clicking it that it was not going to be good.

Wasting time? That would be completely on you buddy. Grow up and just read the reviews that give everything a 5/5 or 10/10.