The below video takes an in depth look at the MPAA’s PG-13 rating.
From its inception to modern interpretations, the video explores the history of the rating and breaks down why it may be ruining movies. The best part is when they talk about studios tricking audiences with graphic imagery that never ended up in the movie (remember Stay Alive or Cursed?). A lot of people are also unaware that R-rated films aren’t allowed the same kind of advertising freedom as the other ratings, which forces studios to aim for PG-13 in order to get better ad slots.
With the new The Crow remake coming soon, we take a look back at the 30-year-old cult classic original–and where the stars are now.
Kaam Chalu Hai Review: Based on true events, this movie is thought-provoking and inspiring
Rebel Moon Part 2 Review: This movie doesn't feel anything new or worth remembering, which is a shame.
"This all harks back to Poltergeist‘s PG rating, which is still shocking to me."
PG-13 rating was introduced in 1984 for Temple Of Doom. Poltergeist is from 1982 preceding the invention of it.
A little...I mean whether you love or hate the films was there any need for Expendables 3 to be a lower age rating.
I'm scared he's going to do this for Rambo V: Last Blood
I think it's worse for horror films to be honest.
All ratings ruin films inmo... Every film should be rating-free. BUT, I understand why ratings exist.
Not really since I don't get off on Gore and Sex in films. Mood is accomplished very easily without these.
What of STORY can't be done with a PG-13 rating?