It sounds like the machine will be sent back to 1984 or something along those lines and survive/operate into the present day as opposed to being Terminated. Sounds reasonable, I hear the fan boys protest. Yes, it can be explained logically but that doesn't mean it can be excused. They were already pushing it ten+ years ago in Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (horrible Terminator movie) with a clearly aged Terminator. Now they're going to push it even further here. The Terminator that real fans know is genetically and perpetually aged around its mid '30s. It likes wearing shades. It is not a retiree who put 200% effort into trying to attain 75% of the physique that has long since left him, with greying and receding hair.
Dignity
Let me throw a word out there so that maybe some can appreciate the potential problem here. Dignity.
With the new The Crow remake coming soon, we take a look back at the 30-year-old cult classic original–and where the stars are now.
Kaam Chalu Hai Review: Based on true events, this movie is thought-provoking and inspiring
Rebel Moon Part 2 Review: This movie doesn't feel anything new or worth remembering, which is a shame.
Honestly though, Arnold(just like a lot of former action stars) need to accept the fact that they aren't the main attraction they used to be. I still think it would be cool to have him involved in the new films, but not as the focal point.
lol, that picture.
Nobody wants to see a 70 year old anything.