410°
Submitted by darklordzor 618d ago | opinion piece

8 Movies Which Are Better Than the Books They're Based On

From Cinelinx:

Just about every movie buff has heard this phrase uttered (if they didn’t say it themselves) by someone, “The movie was good...but the book was better.” Since books have significantly more time to cover character development and a deeper story, there are many people who think this is always the case. Because of that, I’ve come up with a list of the 6 movies that were actually better than the books...Just so you have something to come back with in these kinds of discussions. (Culture)

hazelamy  +   618d ago
i'd say Children Of Men.

the book is more about the government trying to control the populace rather than humanity trying to come to terms with the knowledge of it's impending extinction.

and the lead character of Theo really isn't very likeable in the book, he only seems to agree to help the pregnant girl because he has an attraction to her.

whereas the character in the film seems a little more altruistic, not an out and out hero, he's still got his own reasons, but they're less creepy.

and Clive Owen puts in a fantastic performance in the role.
makes me kinda sad we'll probably never get to see what he could have done with the role of James Bond.

oh and Michael Caine is fantastic as an ageing hippy.

the way the film captures the hopelessness of the situation is just brilliant.

i definitely enjoyed the film more than the book.
rhcpfan  +   618d ago
Requiem for a Dream
gigoran  +   618d ago
As soon as I saw the title "congo" the article lost any credibility it may have had. Comparing congo to the original book is like comparing one piece of feces to another. Even if one is browner than the other, in the end they are both still pieces of excrement. that exact same comparison could be said for twilight. And as for a clockwork orange and fight club... look if the intentions of the writer were to drive up controversy and have people complain and disagree with him, he may very well succeed.
darklordzor  +   617d ago
It's not about controversy at all. I'm not saying either of those books are bad, I'm simply saying the films worked out better, and for those two in particular the reason is because the films made it easier for a wider audience to accept the same message. Reaching people who would be totally lost when they tried to read the book.

As for Congo, I never said either the book or film were very good. In fact I make it known, that neither are "great" by any means. But the film is better than the book, which is the point.

Perhaps reading an article all the way through is in order...
RetrospectRealm  +   618d ago
Most of these are kind of totally obvious while the others are just not true at all.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Batman V Superman: 10 Wild Rumours That Could Happen

9h ago - WC Patience is a virtue, and a quality clearly not possessed by film fans as we get ever close... | Cinema
30°

25 WTF Moments From The Mission: Impossible Franchise

9h ago - WC With the release of the fifth Mission: Impossible movie, Rogue Nation, what better time to... | Culture
Ad

Filmwatch Contest Details

Now - Come celebrate Independence Day with us on Filmwatch and win cool prizes. | Promoted post
20°

Game Of Thrones: 18 Most Outrageous Moments So Far

9h ago - WC Like Valyrian steel being forged with spells, Game of Thrones, since its debut in 2011, has... | Culture
30°

13 Upcoming Netflix Original Shows To Be Excited About

9h ago - WC Netflix used to be the home of films of varying quality, ranging from classic to cult to ju... | VOD
30°

'The Thing' Gets His Name In New Featurette For Josh Trank's Fantastic Four Reboot

9h ago - CBM A new featurette has been released for the upcoming Fantastic Four reboot, and as well as... | Cinema