Keep Your Hair on: Bryan Cranston is not Lex Luthor in 'Man of Steel' Sequel

MSN: Internet hysteria and shoddy journalism have once again teamed up to turn an unsubstantiated rumor into "official" news. But here it is for the record, folks: Bryan Cranston has not, we repeat not, been signed to play Lex Luthor in the "Man of Steel" sequel (a.k.a. "Batman vs. Superman").

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
LtSkittles1148d ago

It's amazing how fast rumors spread these days. It's even more surprising when Rolling Stone picks it up, and reports it as true. It's happened with other stuff as well.

Anthotis1147d ago

It's a shame the Affleck news wasn't untrue.

steven83r1147d ago

Maybe it is true but the studios didn't want it to be announced yet, especially if the contract hasn't been signed. So with all the positive response to him as Lex Luther and contract isn't signed yet, now he can negotiate a bigger deal which the studios were probably trying to avoid.

LtSkittles1147d ago

I don't doubt he could pull it off at all, if anyone could portray Lex Luthor, it would be Bryan Cranston.

tristanwerbe1147d ago

Bryan easily could since Heisenberg is one of the most evil villians ever, Lex is easy for him

Chapter111146d ago

I knew it was too good to be true. Bieber as Luther here we come.