CBM
Man Of Steel continues to polarize cinema goers and critics alike with valid arguments on both sides. Though it is by no stretch a terrible film, let’s take a look at what didn’t quite work with Warner Bro's and DC's most recent adaptation.
While director Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel, starring Henry Cavill and Amy Adams, didn’t make Marvel money on the big screen, the film is constantly cited—for better or worse—as one of the most talked-about superhero films of all time.
A new report claims that Henry Cavill is rumoured to appear at Comic-Con this year to announce his return as Superman to the DCEU.
Look! Up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's "Man of Steel," the film that introduced Henry Cavill as Superman. For many fans, Cavill is the definitive version of the Last Son of Krypton because he looks eerily like the character from the comic book. Even director Zack Snyder insisted that once he saw the actor in the suit, he knew he was the right person for the role.
i thought this superman was awesome.
i really enjoyed it. the story was good, the characters were played well. the fight scenes were good.
as for people saying there was too much action, when spiderman had more lovey-dovey scenes, people complained saying it was a waste of time. if this guy wanted a longer fight scene, wouldnt that make more action?
yes there are going to be loopholes, things they could have done better but no movie is 100% perfect. at least this movie was 10000000000000 times better than the hobbit. i couldn't find anything majorly wrong with it.
maybe you guys who watched the hobbit and thought it was good can answer this for me......you know the scene where they were cornered on the trees on the edge of the cliff, gandalf sends the butterfly for help and it comes back with huge eagles which they jump on and escape..why dont they just call those eagles from the start to take em all to the castle and get the 3 hours cut down to 10 minutes? just asking.
but yeah....man of steel was worth the wait. it lived up to the expectations i had for it. thank god the plot wasn't lame like having real estate fraud going on. and as for lex, they should only bring him in if they can make him as clever as the joker where he actually outsmarts the hero. not like the lex in superman returns.
I thought Man of Steel was awesome too. I don't care what my brother or anyone else thinks of it, I like it and that's all that matters! Cannot wait for a sequel or Justice League movie.
Was a let down for me.
I loved this movie i thought it was on of the best movies in a long time. I dont understand some of these points this guys trying to make? Giant squid thing what!? Did u even watch the movie if u did then ud know its a terraforming device to get the type if oxygen the enemies need and the non stop action is quite refreshing not enough movies i find have action like that.... in a action movie.... the reason of sending superman to earth was to show the people there is other life and to continue crypton life on top of protecting them.... supermans dad couldnt have possibly predicted zod coming back after thousands of years banished and actually finding superman its not like he knew sending superman there would put the people on earth in danger so that point is invalid too and imagine if zod did take over kryptonions and then decided to take over the universe then earth would have been royaly screwed compared to having superman there. And making the action more fast paced IMO puts a more realistic feel of how fast they are compared to slowing it down in fight scenes which is wayyyy to out played, not enough movies make action fast-paced which gives a nice feel of supermans point of view. 5/5 stars for me!