140°
Submitted by danand82 732d ago | opinion piece

Is J.J. Abrams the Right Man for Star Wars: Episode VII?

Clickonline writes: "And doesn’t it seem a bit insane to grant one man control over two of the biggest franchises in genre cinema? Not only that, but two universes which have long existed by contrast to each other, by people extolling their rivalry as ‘Trekkies’ or Star Wars fans. Do we really want a poster in 2015 which states ‘Star Wars: Episode VII – from the director of Star Trek…?’" (Cinema, J.J. Abrams, Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens)

StarWarsFan  +   732d ago
I think a better person could have been chosen. One that is less associated with big franchises and big names, just like how the Bond franchise has done along with the Harry Potter franchise.
aviator189  +   732d ago
I think he's a great choice.
Seeing how well he handled the star trek reboot, I think star wars is safe in his hands.
calis  +   732d ago
I think he is a bit over-rated but he'll do a better job than the prequels.

It all depends which direction he goes in and if he is doing his story or what Warner wants him to do.
Soldierone  +   731d ago
I find it funny, before all this started people were going "Oh his Star Trek is so amazing!!!" Then he gets attached to Star Wars and its "he's over rated" or "Star Trek can quit being Star Wars now."

lol
calis  +   731d ago
I enjoyed Star Trek, though never watched it before the movie. But I've found him over-rated since Cloverfield.

That said, I think he'll do a good enough job at the very least with Star Wars.
Soldierone  +   731d ago
I wasn't trying to attack you by the way lol. I'm reading the over rated comment everywhere.

I personally love Cloverfield, it was more of an experience than anything as I followed the viral marketing for months.
calis  +   731d ago
Oh yeah I know. I find a lot of people have said he is over-rated and ruined (ruining) Star Trek but I don't have a point of reference to compare for that.
danand82  +   730d ago
Did not direct Cloverfield...
aDDicteD  +   726d ago
i think he is just a SAFE pick but not the best pick. he is a proven director in terms of his sci fi projects. star trek was surprisingly revived and disney hopes he can bring star wars back to its glory days again. a better director can be picked but its a great risk because star wars is a money making franchise even more than star trek i suppose, so they have to take it really easy or risk everything.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Gotham: Synopsis For Season 1, Episode 16 "The Blind Fortune Teller" - 'John Grayson' Debuts

28m ago - CBM: The February 16 episode of Fox's Gotham sees Gordon (Ben McKenzie) and Dr. Thompkins (Morena... | TV
20°

Blu-ray Review: The Judge | Cinematically Enigmatic

32m ago - CE: Robert Downey Jr. may never fully escape the gravitational pull of his alter ego, Tony Stark,... | Blu-ray

Kingsman: The Secret Service Review - WhatCulture

34m ago - WC: Kingsman: The Secret Service sees director Matthew Vaughn reteam with co-writer Jane Goodman... | Cinema

New Kingsman: The Secret Service "Spy Movies" Clip

38m ago - CBM: Internet billionaire Valentine (Samuel Jackson) poses a question, "Do you like spy movies, M... | Cinema
Ad

Filmwatch Contest Details

Now - Ring in the new year with gift cards. Check out details on Filmwatch. | Promoted post

New Extended Promo For The Flash Season 1 Episode 12: "Crazy For You"

40m ago - CBM: After striking out repeatedly with their respective love interests, Caitlin & Barry decide t... | TV