Try our new beta!Click here
140°
Submitted by danand82 1110d ago | opinion piece

Is J.J. Abrams the Right Man for Star Wars: Episode VII?

Clickonline writes: "And doesn’t it seem a bit insane to grant one man control over two of the biggest franchises in genre cinema? Not only that, but two universes which have long existed by contrast to each other, by people extolling their rivalry as ‘Trekkies’ or Star Wars fans. Do we really want a poster in 2015 which states ‘Star Wars: Episode VII – from the director of Star Trek…?’" (Cinema, J.J. Abrams, Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens)

StarWarsFan  +   1110d ago
I think a better person could have been chosen. One that is less associated with big franchises and big names, just like how the Bond franchise has done along with the Harry Potter franchise.
aviator189  +   1110d ago
I think he's a great choice.
Seeing how well he handled the star trek reboot, I think star wars is safe in his hands.
calis  +   1110d ago
I think he is a bit over-rated but he'll do a better job than the prequels.

It all depends which direction he goes in and if he is doing his story or what Warner wants him to do.
Soldierone  +   1109d ago
I find it funny, before all this started people were going "Oh his Star Trek is so amazing!!!" Then he gets attached to Star Wars and its "he's over rated" or "Star Trek can quit being Star Wars now."

lol
calis  +   1109d ago
I enjoyed Star Trek, though never watched it before the movie. But I've found him over-rated since Cloverfield.

That said, I think he'll do a good enough job at the very least with Star Wars.
Soldierone  +   1109d ago
I wasn't trying to attack you by the way lol. I'm reading the over rated comment everywhere.

I personally love Cloverfield, it was more of an experience than anything as I followed the viral marketing for months.
calis  +   1109d ago
Oh yeah I know. I find a lot of people have said he is over-rated and ruined (ruining) Star Trek but I don't have a point of reference to compare for that.
danand82  +   1108d ago
Did not direct Cloverfield...
aDDicteD  +   1104d ago
i think he is just a SAFE pick but not the best pick. he is a proven director in terms of his sci fi projects. star trek was surprisingly revived and disney hopes he can bring star wars back to its glory days again. a better director can be picked but its a great risk because star wars is a money making franchise even more than star trek i suppose, so they have to take it really easy or risk everything.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Review l Film Takeout

5h ago - Amanda Hogan from Film Takeout writes: "To be fair, though, that’s what happens when something... | Cinema
20°

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Review | Eggplante

5h ago - Eggplante: "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies won't go down as a standout movie for 2016, but consi... | Cinema
Ad

Guess N4G Game of the Year Winners, win a $300 Amazon Gift Card

Now - Also enter for a chance to win a gift card for writing a user blog, writing a user review, or being a top contributor for the month. | Promoted post
20°

Hail, Caesar! (2016) Review | FilmGamesEtc

5h ago - FGE -Generally, the idea of movies about movies is far too meta. However, Hail, Caesar! is a biza... | Cinema
40°

Hail, Caesar! Review | Cinelinx

10h ago - From Cinelinx: Hail, Caesar! is a Hollywood movie making fun of Hollywood. The Coen brothers... | Cinema
40°

3 Reasons Netflix And Other Streaming Services Could End The Era Of Movie Theaters

17h ago - Moviepilot I was born in 1992, a wonderful year that saw the last episode of The Tonight Show... | Culture