Clickonline writes "If a trailer is typically considered sufficient to excite audiences, then I feel justified my concerns for Man of Steel.
I DON’T WANT to watch a film wherein the world’s finest Superhero doubts whether or not he should enjoy his limitless power. Or save a busload of drowning chizzlers...
I DON’T NEED a Superman tale in which he fishes, fishes, rather than saving lives, inspiring good deeds and high-fiving everyone in Western Europe!"
Troll-lololol-lolololol
What a negative post. Seems to me that you're in a vast minority over how Man of Steel looks dude.
this guy is a typical fanboy. its sad. yes, if this movie is 100% like he wants it to be, only 3 people will like it. and most probably those 3 people will still find fault with it. a movie like this will appeal to the larger masses and draw in bigger audiences. <its business>
as for superman returns, that movie was ass. plain and simple. no other words for it. apart from the 3 mins shuttle launch at the start, the rest of the movie wasnt worth watching. but i guess this guy thinks that movie was the shit and that Routh is the best superman EVEEEERRR!!!!
There's a few things that made Superman Returns falter. James Marsden's character, Lois's kid, recycled material from the first Superman movie and no formidable foe to fight other than a Kryptonite continent/mountain. Which I should add, he shouldn't even have been able to get near for miles.
I'm really looking forward to seeing this new Superman movie. It's a Superman movie that needed to be unique unto it's own and branch itself away from the original series much like Batman did. It looks like he's actually going to throw a few punches, which was an aspect missing in Superman Returns.