Actually he got everything legally which is why the charges do not include his weapons. Quite sad that places allow the legal purchase of assault rifles.

Elaborate, please.

Great comprehension work, you misinterpreted what i was implying. Yes, removing guns won't stop the killing (DER) since other methods are available, but what it CAN DO, is cause fewer deaths, compared to rifles, etc.

What mentality is yours BTW? how do you explain other countries with less weapons and overall fewer death counts? the US is above all in terms of fire arm kills. WHY IS THAT (common fucking sense)

US laws are complete shit, and what's worse is the EGO that flows right with it.

None of those other methods of destruction can compare to a powerful developed automatic firearm. It's much more QUICK and EFFECTIVE, one with little chance of prevention. UNDERSTAND?

Stop trying to be in the minority. We are all different and those who are much more unstable and prone to violence shouldn't be able to go out and purchase a fucking weapon.

the mentality of the US and it's obsession with past rights and laws is pathetic, not to mention blinded by the ego of ones over developed country due to being a super power.

Do me and favor and stop just thinking of yourself and within primitive views.

other BIGGER countries with a bigger WAR past that have heavier GUN laws, have FEWER deaths compared to the United States....AGAIN, why the FUCK do you think that is?

@fastnslow

Again being completely ignorant and looking at just numbers rather than the factors and outliers.

You need to take into account

A. Where do most killings and murders happen
B. when and why
C. Who was killed/involved
D. How was the firearm aquired

Most gun killings in the united states are done by mentally unstable people an or gang related issues. IN slums an in places where people think they have no where else to turn. most of the weapons are also illegally obtained or stolen.

Your also not taking population and culture into account. Look at many countries where there are limited firearms. There are increases in dismemberments, beheadings, "accidents", beatings, standings etc. I'd personally rather be shot then have my head slowly cut off. And yes a bomb is much more effective than a firearm. Why? Easily concealed. All you need is fertilizer and a truck and you can take a building down.

A fully automatic weapon is NOT as easy to fire as te media makes it out to be. There are many factors involved etc but the closer you are then obviously it's easier. HOWEVER concealment becomes an issue at that point. Most fully automatic weaponry is not easy to hide. Ever fire a fully automatic weapon? I have and I couldn't hit shit past 30 yards on full auto.

You really do not like to do research huh? Just surf the interwebs for what ever suits your view.

Also you call my thinking primitive when your the one getting all angry and swearing up a storm being extremely immature. Nice one btw.

When researching I'll give you a hint. Use official databases. Not the Internet ok kid?

Im going to have to agree with fastNslowww on this one.

@h311rais3r

You say it would happen with bombs if there were no guns. Is it that easy to build a bomb? You make it sound like a teenager can just roll up and poof a bomb is made from fertilizer. I tell you one thing.. most crazies dont take that much time and effort. They just wanna pull the trigger. And yes people would still get killed with knives, but how many exactly? If i see a guy with an assault rifle.. im pretty much shit out of luck. If i see a guy stabbing people with knives..hes going to catch the beat down of his life by 20 of us.

Gun laws here in this country are rediculous. People want to justify gun laws saying only criminals would have the guns. Well they only have the guns cause they are so readily available. Most criminals wouldnt have guns with the appropriate laws. Some still would if they were that deep into the lifestyle and knew where to go for them, but the next columbine kid wont have those guns available to him.

Not to mention how many children end up blowing their heads off or their parents heads off because they found one in the house and decided to play with it. Happens all the time.

I never said they did. I'm just saying they've said hes not there to promote the film and I believe them.

But is presence there still does, if you get what i'm saying.

Batman shootings - So Bale (Batman himself) goes to see them.

Who said I was bitching?

Why is it nobody can see my point that it still promoted the film but very very slightly.